Lynch & Haney on Capital Jury Deliberation: Effects on Death Sentencing, Comprehension, and Discrimination

Professor Mona Lynch of the University of California, Irvine School of Social Ecology, and Professor Craig Haney of the University of California, Santa Cruz Department of Psychology, have published Capital Jury Deliberation: Effects on Death Sentencing, Comprehension, and Discrimination, 33 Law and Human Behavior 481 (2009). Here is the abstract:

“This study focused on whether and how deliberations affected the comprehension of capital penalty phase jury instructions and patterns of racially discriminatory death sentencing. Jury-eligible subjects were randomly assigned to view one of four versions of a simulated capital penalty trial in which the race of defendant (Black or White) and the race of victim (Black or White) were varied orthogonally. The participants provided their initial ‘straw’ sentencing verdicts individually and then deliberated in simulated 4–7 person ‘juries.’ Results indicated that deliberation created a punitive rather than lenient shift in the jurors’ death sentencing behavior, failed to improve characteristically poor instructional comprehension, did not reduce the tendency for jurors to misuse penalty phase evidence (especially, mitigation), and exacerbated the tendency among White mock jurors to sentence Black defendants to death more often than White defendants.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 97 other followers

%d bloggers like this: