Recent Ethics Opinions on Lawyers’ Ghostwriting of Legal Papers

A number of legal ethics opinions have recently been issued respecting whether a lawyer may write court papers for a pro se litigant without the lawyer’s disclosing his or her involvement to the court or opposing counsel. Here is a selected list of such opinions:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Recent Ethics Opinions on Lawyers’ Ghostwriting of Legal Papers”

  1. legalinformatics Says:

    Thanks to Wick R. Chambers for pointing out this recent Connecticut ethics opinion on ghostwriting http://j.mp/dtElKL

  2. legalinformatics Says:

    Thanks to Stephanie Kimbro for identifying this February 2010 ruling of a magistrate judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, interpreting and applying the court’s local rules of professional conduct, http://j.mp/90Z73g , to prohibit a lawyer’s ghostwriting legal papers for a pro se litigant. Thigpen v. Banas, Case No. 08 C 4820 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 11, 2010), http://j.mp/atP1yp . Ms. Kimbro’s post about the case is here: http://ht.ly/1JC3L .

  3. Ghostwriting, Ghostblawging and Ghostbusting « THE TRIAL WARRIOR BLOG Says:

    [...] Legal Informatics Blog: Recent Ethics Opinions on Lawyers’ Ghostwriting of Legal Papers [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96 other followers

%d bloggers like this: