Dr. Bryna Bogoch of Bar Ilan University Department of Political Studies and Professor Yifat Holzman-Gazit of the College of Management School of Law, have published Clashing Over Conversion: “Who is a Jew” and Media Representations of an Israeli Supreme Court Decision, forthcoming in International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. Here is the abstract:
Religion-state issues are particularly contentious in the Israeli context and they are often resolved by litigation before the Supreme Court in its capacity as the High Court of Justice. A recent controversy that reached Israel’s High Court of Justice in 2005 involved a petition to recognize the validity of non-Orthodox conversions to Judaism. This paper examines the role of the press in constructing the controversy and the image of the High Court of Justice by analyzing all the reports and editorials in both an elite and in a popular newspaper, published from a week before the decision was issued until to 1 month afterwards. It looks at the visual, inter-textual and linguistic features of the articles and analyzes the frames used in representing the Court, the petitioners, and the controversy. We found that two distinct frames were used by the papers to convey the essence of the controversy in the Tushbeim case. While the organizing idea in Haaretz, the elite newspaper, was one of Israel as a civic state, Yediot, the popular newspaper, emphasized the religious dimension of Israeli nationhood. Moreover, contrary to widespread perceptions of the popular press, it presented a wider range of views than did the elite newspaper, which tended to praise the Court and to support the decision. However, both papers avoided challenges to the basic issue of whether religious authorities should control the definition of the character of Israel as a Jewish State. Thus, the media in effect defined the terms of the struggle over the Jewish identity of the state within consensual boundaries.
Tags: Bryna Bogoch, Case studies in legal communication studies, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Israel High Court of Justice, Israel Supreme Court, Legal communication, Media representation of court decisions, Media representation of judicial decisions, Yifat Holzman-Gazit
