Dr. Simon Attfield of the Middlesex University School of Engineering and Information Sciences Interaction Design Centre, and Professor Ann Blandford of University College London UCL Interaction Centre, have published Discovery-Led Refinement in e-Discovery Investigations: Sensemaking, Cognitive Ergonomics and System Design, forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Here is the abstract:
Given the very large numbers of documents involved in e-discovery investigations, lawyers face a considerable challenge of collaborative sensemaking. We report findings from three workplace studies which looked at different aspects of how this challenge was met. From a sociotechnical perspective, the studies aimed to understand how investigators collectively and individually worked with information to support sensemaking and decision making. Here, we focus on discovery-led refinement; specifically, how engaging with the materials of the investigations led to discoveries that supported refinement of the problems and new strategies for addressing them. These refinements were essential for tractability. We begin with observations which show how new lines of enquiry were recursively embedded. We then analyse the conceptual structure of a line of enquiry and consider how reflecting this in e-discovery support systems might support scalability and group collaboration. We then focus on the individual activity of manual document review where refinement corresponded with the inductive identification of classes of irrelevant and relevant documents within a collection. Our observations point to the effects of priming on dealing with these efficiently and to issues of cognitive ergonomics at the human–computer interface. We use these observations to introduce visualisations that might enable reviewers to deal with such refinements more efficiently.
Tags: Ann Blandford, Artificial intelligence and law, Cognitive ergonomics in legal information systems, Collaboration in ediscovery, Collaboration in ediscovery investigation, Collaboration in legal document review, Collaboration in legal information behavior, ediscovery, Electronic discovery, Ethnographic methods in legal communication studies, Ethnographic methods in legal informatics, Lawyers' legal information behavior, Legal document review, Legal evidence information systems, Legal human computer interaction, Legal information behavior, Legal information behavior in ediscovery, Legal information behavior in legal document review, Priming in ediscovery investigation, Priming in legal document review, Priming in legal information behavior, Relevance in ediscovery, Relevance in legal document review, Sensemaking in legal communication studies, Sensemaking in legal informatics, Simon Attfield, Sociotechnical methods in legal communication studies, Sociotechnical methods in legal informatics, Visualization in ediscovery, Visualization in legal document review, Visualization of legal information