Videos are available of papers given at the workshop, Standards of Proof and Scientific Evidence, held 26-27 May 2011 at the University of Girona Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica, in Girona, Catalonia, Spain:
- Larry Laudan, The Elementary Epistemic Arithmetic of the Law II: The Inadequate Resources of Moral Theory for Dealing with the Criminal Law
- Susan Haack, Legal probabilism: An Epistemological Dissent
- Michael S. Pardo, Relevance, Standards of Proof, and Evidence Theory
- Ronald J. Allen, Standards of Proof and the Limits of Legal Analysis
- Andrés Páez, Deciding Whom to Believe: Testimony as Evidence
- Michele Taruffo, Applying scientific standards to social science and forensic evidence
- Marina Gascón, Scientific Proof. A map of Challenges
- Dr. Paul Roberts, Was the Baby Shaken? Evidence, Expertise and Legal Epistemology in English Criminal Trials
Tags: Admissibility of legal evidence, Expert evidence, Legal evidence information systems, Standards of Proof and Scientific Evidence, Workshop: Standards of Proof and Scientific Evidence
