A call for papers — with paper submission deadline of 18 January 2013 — has been issued for ICAIL 2013: 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, to be held 10-14 June 2013 in Rome, Italy.
The Twitter account for the conference is @ICAIL2013 . The Twitter hashtag for the conference is #ICAIL2013. The conference organizers invite those interested to follow the Twitter account and hashtag and to comment and contribute with the latest news.
The conference features two tracks: one for “regular papers” and one for “innovative applications papers.”
Here is the complete list of deadlines:
- Mentoring program request deadline: November 9, 2012
- Mentoring program paper deadline: November 16, 2012
- Submission of workshop and tutorial proposals: December 7, 2012
- Submission of abstracts (optional): January 11, 2013
- Submission of papers deadline: January 18, 2013
- Notification of acceptance: March 20, 2013
- Final revised and formatted papers due: April 19, 2013
- Conference: June 10 – June 14, 2013
Papers are invited on the following topics:
- Formal and computational models of legal reasoning
- Knowledge acquisition techniques for the legal domain, including natural language processing and data mining
- Computational models of argumentation and decision making
- Legal knowledge representation including legal ontologies and common sense knowledge
- Automatic legal text classification and summarization
- Automated information extraction from legal databases and texts
- Machine learning and data mining applied to legal databases
- Conceptual or model-based legal information retrieval
- E-discovery and e-disclosure
- E-government and e-justice
- Computational models of evidential reasoning
- Modeling norms for multi-agent systems
- Modeling negotiation and contract formation
- Computational models of case-based legal reasoning
- Online dispute resolution
- Intelligent legal tutoring systems
- Intelligent support systems for the legal domain
- Interdisciplinary applications of legal informatics methods and systems
For more information, please see the call for papers.
HT Anne Gardner
[NOTE: Updated 23 November 2012 to add the Twitter account and hashtag. HT Enrico Francesconi]
Tags: Artificial intelligence and law, Automatic classification of legal documents, Automatic classification of legal texts, Automatic legal information extraction, Automatic summarization of legal text, Bart Verheij, Conceptual information retrieval and law, Conceptual legal information retrieval, Contract information systems, Court information systems, ediscovery, egovernment, eJustice, Electronic discovery, Electronic evidence information systems, Electronic government, Enrico Francesconi, Evidentiary information systems, ICAIL, ICAIL 2013, Interdisciplinary legal informatics methodologies, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ITTIG-CNR, Judicial information systems, Legal agent based systems, Legal case based reasoning, Legal common sense knowledge, Legal communication, Legal data mining, Legal decision support systems, Legal educational technology, Legal evidence information systems, Legal evidentiary reasoning, Legal expert systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal informatics methodologies, Legal information extraction, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal knowledge representation, Legal machine learning, Legal multiagent systems, Legal negotiation, Legal norms in multiagent systems, Legal ontologies, Legal text mining, Legal text processing, Legal tutoring systems, Machine learning and law, Machine learning and legal texts, Model based legal information retrieval, Model-based information retrieval and law, Modeling contract formation, Modeling contracts, Modeling evidentiary reasoning, Modeling legal argumentation, Modeling legal case based reasoning, Modeling legal communication, Modeling legal contracts, Modeling legal evidentiary reasoning, Modeling legal logic, Modeling legal negotiation, Modeling legal norms, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling legal rules, Online dispute resolution, Representing legal common sense knowledge
