Professor Dr. Douglas Walton of the University of Windsor, and Nanning Zhang of China University of Political Science and Law, have published The Epistemology of Scientific Evidence, forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law.
Here is the abstract:
In place of the traditional epistemological view of knowledge as justified true belief we argue that artificial intelligence and law needs an evidence-based epistemology according to which scientific knowledge is based on critical analysis of evidence using argumentation. This new epistemology of scientific evidence (ESE) models scientific knowledge as achieved through a process of marshaling evidence in a scientific inquiry that results in a convergence of scientific theories and research results. We show how a dialogue interface of argument from expert opinion, along with its set of critical questions, provides the argumentation component of the ESE. It enables internal scientific knowledge to be translated over into a wider arena in which individual nonexpert citizens and groups can make use of it. The external component shows how evidence is presented and used in a legal procedural setting that includes fact-finding, weighing the credibility of expert witnesses, and critical questioning of arguments. The paper critically reviews the standards of admissibility of scientific evidence using the ESE.
Tags: Artificial intelligence and law, Douglas Walton, Epistemology of scientific evidence, Legal argumentation, Legal argumentation and legal knowledge, Legal argumentation in legal evidence information systems, Legal epistemology, Legal evidence and knowledge, Legal evidence and legal knowledge, Legal evidence information systems, Legal knowledge, Legal knowledge and legal argumentation, Legal knowledge and legal evidence, Legal knowledge production, Legal knowledge systems, Nanning Zhang, Production of legal knowledge
