Professor Dr. Mathias M. Siems of Durham University Law School and Dr. Daithi Mac Sithigh of University of Edinburgh School of Law have published Mapping Legal Research, Cambridge Law Journal, 71(3): 651-676 (2012).
Here is the abstract:
This article aims to map the position of academic legal research, using a distinction between “law as a practical discipline”, “law as humanities” and “law as social sciences” as a conceptual framework. Having explained this framework, we address both the “macro” and “micro” level of legal research in the UK. For this purpose, we have collected information on the position of all law schools within the structure of their respective universities. We also introduce “ternary plots” as a new way of explaining individual research preferences. Our general result is that all three categories play a role within the context of UK legal academia, though the relationship between the “macro” and the “micro” level is not always straight-forward. We also provide comparisons with the US and Germany and show that in all three countries law as an academic tradition has been constantly evolving, raising questions such as whether the UK could or should move further to a social science model already dominant in the US.
The Online Supplement for this paper is available at the following URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2097698
Tags: Cambridge Law Journal, Daithi Mac Sithigh, Law as a discipline, Law as a scholarly discipline, Law as an academic discipline, Law schools, Legal education, Legal research, Legal scholarship, Mathias M. Siems, Mathias Siems