Kelly Lynn Anders, JD has published Ethical Exits: When Lawyers and Judges Must Sever Ties on Social Media, Charleston Law Review, Vol. 7, 187-205 (2012-2013).
Here is the abstract:
This article addresses the very recent trend of requiring lawyers and judges to sever ties on social media, the professional implications of doing so, relevant rules governing judicial and attorney conduct, and a discussion of “best practices” for lawyers and judges to follow when social media connections must be broken. Recent opinions from states that have issued social media directives in this area will also be discussed, along with a brief overview of three of the most commonly used social media sites at the time of the publication of this article – Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter.
Through this discussion and analysis, one theme will continue to resurface – the increasingly pressing need for guidance and clarity in the MRPC and M[C]JC so that expectations involving social media connections will be clear, uniform, and much easier to manage for lawyers, judges, and anyone with whom they may communicate, either professionally or personally. Such clear-cut guidance would also decrease the need for severing ties that should not have been formed in the first place, thereby also serving to contribute to the preservation of solid and favorable reputations of all jurists and counselors in an increasingly virtual world.
Tags: Charleston Law Review, Judges' legal communication, Judges' online legal communication, Judges' use of social networks, Kelly Lynn Anders, Law practice technology, Lawyers' use of social media. Judges' use of social media, Lawyers' use of social networks, Lawyers' use of technology, Legal communication, Legal ethics, Legal ethics and legal social media, Legal social media, Legal social media and legal ethics, Online legal communication, Social media and legal communication, Web 2.0 and law, Web 2.0 and legal communication