The new issue of Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (10(2), June 2013) includes several articles on legal information or decision making:
- Doug Williams: Do Racial Preferences Affect Minority Learning in Law Schools?
- Andreas Glöckner and Christoph Engel: Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? Standards of Proof and the Probative Value of Evidence in Coherence-Based Reasoning
- Christina L. Boyd, David A. Hoffman, Zoran Obradovic and Kosta Ristovski: Building a Taxonomy of Litigation: Clusters of Causes of Action in Federal Complaints
- Ryan C. Black and James F. Spriggs II: The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent
- William C. Thompson, Suzanne O. Kaasa and Tiamoyo Peterson: Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence?
Tags: Citation of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, Coherence based legal reasoning, Forensic identification evidence, Identification evidence, Influence of affirmative action on learning in law schools, Influences on learning in law schools, Intuition in jurors' legal decision making, Intuition in jurors' legal reasoning, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Jurors' attitudes towards DNA evidence, Jurors' coherence based legal reasoning, Jurors' evaluation of DNA evidence, Jurors' legal reasoning, Learning in law schools, Legal citation, Legal citation analysis, Legal citation studies, Legal communication, Legal evidence information systems, Legal reasoning, Legal standards of proof, Legal taxonomies, Litigation taxonomies, Taxonomies of causes of action, Taxonomies of litigation, U.S. Supreme Court