Posts Tagged ‘Court technology’
March 16, 2013
Dr. Margaret Hagan of Stanford Law School has launched Open Law Lab, “an initiative to design law – to make it more accessible, more usable, and more engaging.”
Dr. Hagan says that the Lab currently is a nonprofit collaborative project among law students.
The Lab’s work currently addresses:
For more information, please see the Open Law Lab Website.
HT @margarethagan here and here
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Alternative dispute resolution, Court information systems, Court technology, Design of legal information systems, Gamification of legal education, Gamification of legal educational technology, Gamification of legal information systems, Gamification of legal instructional technology, Innovation in legal information systems, Innovation in legal services, Innovation in legal technology, Judicial information systems, Law games, Law gamification, Legal educational technology, Legal information systems design, Legal instructional technology, Legal services innovation, Legal technology innovation, Margaret Hagan, Online dispute resolution, Open Law Lab, Technology for access to justice, Visualization of legal information
Posted in Applications, Projects, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
January 27, 2013
The Moroccan Court of Cassation has announced plans to undertake several digital projects, including implementing electronic document management and case management and virtual hearings, according to the article La Cour de cassation à l’heure du numérique: Vers l’utilisation des NTIC dans le traitement et la gestion des dossiers, Libération Maroc, 24 January 2013.
HT @GderoubaiX and @adreagui
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Court document management systems, Court information systems, Court technology, Judicial information systems, Judicial technology, Legal case management systems, Libération Maroc, Morocco, Morocco Cour de cassation, Morocco Court of Cassation, Virtual hearings
Posted in Applications, Projects | Leave a Comment »
December 17, 2012
Tags:Artificial intelligence and law, Bill drafting systems, Burkhard Schafer, Copyright information systems, Court technology, Digital rights management, egovernment, Intellectual property information systems, Interdisciplinary legal informatics research, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Judicial information systems, JURIX, JURIX 2012, Law practice technology, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal compliance information systems, Legal drafting systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal expert systems, Legal expert systems for judges, Legal expert systems for legislators, Legal inference, Legal information management systems, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal intelligent agents, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge management systems, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal ontologies, Legal reasoning, Legal semantic web, Legal XML, Legislative expert systems, Legislative information systems, Legislative XML, Modeling legal actions of digital institutions, Modeling legal actions of intelligent agents, Modeling legal acts, Modeling legal acts of digital institutions, Modeling legal acts of electronic institutions, Modeling legal acts of intelligent agents, Modeling legal argumentation, Modeling legal inference, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling legal rules, Online dispute resolution, Online dispute resolution systems, Public administration information systems, Quality control in legal information systems, Quality control in legal knowledge systems, Regulatory compliance information systems, Regulatory information systems, Semantic Web and law, Tom van Engers, Validating legal knowledge systems, Verifying legal knowledge systems, XML for contracts, XML for court decisions XML for judicial decisions, XML for legal documents, XML for regulations
Posted in Applications, Conference Announcements, Technology developments, Technology tools, Tweet archives | 1 Comment »
October 25, 2012
Tags:Canadian Forum on Court Technology, CFCT, CFCT 2012, Court information systems, Court technology, Innovation in court information systems, Innovation in court technology, Innovation in judicial information systems, Innovation in judicial technology, Innovation in legal technology, James McMillan, Judicial information systems, Judicial technology, Legal case management systems, Legal document management systems, Legal informatics conferences
Posted in Applications, Conference resources, Tweet archives | Leave a Comment »
September 1, 2012
The call for papers submission deadline for JURIX 2012: International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems has been extended to 7 September 2012.
Click here for the call for papers.
The conference will be held 17-19 December 2012 at the University of Amsterdam.
Papers are invited “on the advanced management of legal information and knowledge, covering foundations, methods, tools, systems and applications” concerning the following topics:
- Support for lawyers, in legal reasoning, document drafting, negotiation;
- Support for the production and management of legislation, in agenda setting, policy analysis, drafting, workflow management, monitoring implementation;
- Support for the judiciary, in application of the law, analysis of evidence, management of cases;
- Support for police activities, in forensic inquiries, search and evaluation of evidence, management of investigations;
- Support for public administration, in applying regulations and managing information;
- Support for the acquisition, management or use of legal knowledge, using rules, cases, neural networks, intelligent agents or other methods;
- Systems and methods to support policies and legal issues for social networks;
- Retrieval of legal information;
- Legal education;
- Digital-rights management;
- Alternative dispute resolution, particularly on-line;
- Regulatory compliance and compliance of business processes;
- Theoretical foundations for the use of Artificial Intelligence techniques in the legal domain;
- Models of legal knowledge, including concepts (legal ontologies), rules, cases, principles, values and procedures;
- Legal inference and argumentation;
- Verification and validation of legal knowledge systems;
- Management of legal information in the semantic web;
- XML standards for legal documents, including legislative, judicial, administrative acts as well as private documents, such as contracts;
- Modelling the legal interactions of autonomous agents and digital institutions;
- Methods for managing organizational change when introducing legal knowledge systems;
- Evaluation of systems using advanced informatics techniques in legal applications;
- Interdisciplinary applications of legal informatics methods and systems.
For more information, please see the call for papers.
HT Dr. Rinke Hoekstra.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Artificial intelligence and law, Bill drafting systems, Burkhard Schafer, Copyright information systems, Court technology, Digital rights management, egovernment, Intellectual property information systems, Interdisciplinary legal informatics research, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Judicial information systems, JURIX, JURIX 2012, Law practice technology, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal compliance information systems, Legal drafting systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal expert systems, Legal expert systems for judges, Legal expert systems for legislators, Legal inference, Legal information management systems, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal intelligent agents, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge management systems, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal ontologies, Legal reasoning, Legal semantic web, Legal XML, Legislative expert systems, Legislative information systems, Legislative XML, Modeling legal actions of digital institutions, Modeling legal actions of intelligent agents, Modeling legal acts, Modeling legal acts of digital institutions, Modeling legal acts of electronic institutions, Modeling legal acts of intelligent agents, Modeling legal argumentation, Modeling legal inference, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling legal rules, Online dispute resolution, Online dispute resolution systems, Public administration information systems, Quality control in legal information systems, Quality control in legal knowledge systems, Regulatory compliance information systems, Regulatory information systems, Semantic Web and law, Tom van Engers, Validating legal knowledge systems, Verifying legal knowledge systems, XML for contracts, XML for court decisions XML for judicial decisions, XML for legal documents, XML for regulations
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
May 30, 2012
A call for papers — with submission deadline of 1 September 2012 — has been issued for JURIX 2012: The 25th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, to be held 17-19 December 2012, at the University of Amsterdam, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Papers are invited “on the advanced management of legal information and knowledge, covering foundations, methods, tools, systems and applications” concerning the following topics:
- Support for lawyers, in legal reasoning, document drafting, negotiation;
- Support for the production and management of legislation, in agenda setting, policy analysis, drafting, workflow management, monitoring implementation;
- Support for the judiciary, in application of the law, analysis of evidence, management of cases;
- Support for police activities, in forensic inquiries, search and evaluation of evidence, management of investigations;
- Support for public administration, in applying regulations and managing information;
- Support for the acquisition, management or use of legal knowledge, using rules, cases, neural networks, intelligent agents or other methods;
- Systems and methods to support policies and legal issues for social networks;
- Retrieval of legal information;
- Legal education;
- Digital-rights management;
- Alternative dispute resolution, particularly on-line;
- Regulatory compliance and compliance of business processes;
- Theoretical foundations for the use of Artificial Intelligence techniques in the legal domain;
- Models of legal knowledge, including concepts (legal ontologies), rules, cases, principles, values and procedures;
- Legal inference and argumentation;
- Verification and validation of legal knowledge systems;
- Management of legal information in the semantic web;
- XML standards for legal documents, including legislative, judicial, administrative acts as well as private documents, such as contracts;
- Modelling the legal interactions of autonomous agents and digital institutions;
- Methods for managing organizational change when introducing legal knowledge systems;
- Evaluation of systems using advanced informatics techniques in legal applications;
- Interdisciplinary applications of legal informatics methods and systems.
For more information, please see the call for papers.
HT Professor Dr. Burkhard Schafer.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Artificial intelligence and law, Bill drafting systems, Burkhard Schafer, Copyright information systems, Court technology, Digital rights management, egovernment, Intellectual property information systems, Interdisciplinary legal informatics research, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Judicial information systems, JURIX, JURIX 2012, Law practice technology, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal compliance information systems, Legal drafting systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal expert systems, Legal expert systems for judges, Legal expert systems for legislators, Legal inference, Legal information management systems, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal intelligent agents, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge management systems, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal ontologies, Legal reasoning, Legal semantic web, Legal XML, Legislative expert systems, Legislative information systems, Legislative XML, Modeling legal actions of digital institutions, Modeling legal actions of intelligent agents, Modeling legal acts, Modeling legal acts of digital institutions, Modeling legal acts of electronic institutions, Modeling legal acts of intelligent agents, Modeling legal argumentation, Modeling legal inference, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling legal rules, Online dispute resolution, Online dispute resolution systems, Public administration information systems, Quality control in legal information systems, Quality control in legal knowledge systems, Regulatory compliance information systems, Regulatory information systems, Semantic Web and law, Tom van Engers, Validating legal knowledge systems, Verifying legal knowledge systems, XML for contracts, XML for court decisions XML for judicial decisions, XML for legal documents, XML for regulations
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
February 5, 2012
CALI, the Center for Computer Assisted Legal Instruction, is offering a free, online course on digital law practice, from 10 February – 6 April 2012.
The Twitter hashtag for the course is #tdlp.
The course will address topics including management of a virtual law office, electronic document automation and standardization, court technology, unauthorized practice of law, unbundling of legal service, and lawyers’ use of social media.
The instructors include Stephanie Kimbro, Marc Lauritsen, Richard Granat, Ronald Staudt, Kingsley Martin, Sarah Glassmeyer, William Hornsby, and Ernest Svenson.
For registration or more information, please see the course Website.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:#tdlp, CALI, Court technology, Digital law practice, Electronic contracts, Electronic legal document standards, Ernest Svenson, Kingsley Martin, Law practice technology, Legal document automation, Legal document management systems, Legal social media, Marc Lauritsen, Practicing law online, Richard Granat, Ronald Staudt, Sarah Glassmeyer, Stephanie Kimbro, Virtual law practice, Web 2.0 and law, William Hornsby
Posted in Applications, Courses and curricula, Technology developments, Technology tools | 10 Comments »
October 7, 2011
Slides are available for many of the presentations given at CTC 2011: The 2011 Court Technology Conference (Twitter hashtag #ctc2011), held 4-6 October 2011 in Long Beach, California, USA.
The presentations included:
For more information, please see the complete conference program.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Court decisions, Court performance measures, Court technology, Court Technology Conference, CTC, CTC 2011, Digital legal publishing, Dory Reiling, Free access to law, James McMillan, Judicial decisions, Law practice technology, Peter Martin, Public access to legal information, Trial technology
Posted in Applications, Conference papers, Conference proceedings, Policy debates, Policy Materials | Leave a Comment »
September 9, 2011
James E. McMillan of the National Center for State Courts has posted E-Filing Must Support the Self-Represented, Court Technology Bulletin, 8 September 2011.
This is the latest post in Mr. McMillan’s series, Eight Rules of E-Filing.
In this post, Mr. McMillan argues that e-filing systems implemented by courts in which large numbers of self-represented litigants appear must be designed for use by those litigants. Mr. McMillan then describes a number of court technologies that that enable self-represented litigants to file litigation papers online.
For more information, please see the complete post.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Access to justice, Court technology, Court Technology Bulletin, efiling, James E. McMillan, Jim McMillan, Judicial efiling systems, Law practice technology, Legal information services for pro se litigants, Pro se litigants, Self represented litigants, Technology and access to justice
Posted in Applications, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
July 8, 2011
Kate Krontiris of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and the MIT Sloan School of Management has released two new posts on the topic of “mobile justice”: Mobile Justice in 500 Words, and On the Many Manifestations of “Mobile Justice,” on her tumblr.
In the first post, Ms. Krontiris defines “mobile justice” as “the idea that mobile technologies, broadly defined, can be used to extend and improve access to justice.” She states that the term “includes initiatives such as virtual courts in Kenya, live-streamed court proceedings in Massachusetts, and SMS-sharing of legal judgments in Ghana”; and that mobile justice efforts are being undertaken by governments, civil society organizations, and businesses, and “almost always require the strong collaboration of all of these stakeholders.” The post goes on to discuss how mobile justice initiatives are being used in the reform of judicial processes, and may contribute to improving the rule of law and human rights enforcement in many jurisdictions.
In the second post, Ms. Krontiris discusses private mobile justice providers. The post focuses on Crimefighters, a “[c]onfidential information hotline” — offered in Ghana by mobile phone company MTN — that enables citizens to report crimes via mobile phone, free of charge. With MTN as an example, the post discusses “the emerging role of private actors in resourcing public” justice information and communication services.
These posts follow on Ms. Krontiris’s 2010 post on mobile justice, Using Technology to Bridge the Gap, at the U.S. Department of State’s DipNote blog, and her 2010 post, On the Potential of Mobile Justice, at Huffington Post.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:911, Access to justice, Court decisions, Court technology, Digital legal publishing, egovernment, eJustice, Ghana, Human rights, ICT4D, Judicial information systems, Kate Krontiris, Mobile devices and access to justice, Mobile devices and crime reporting, Mobile devices and law, Mobile justice, Mobile phones and access to justice, Mobile phones and criminal justice information services, Mobile phones and legal information services, MTN, Privatization of criminal justice information services, Privitization of legal information services, Rule of law, SMS, SMS and court decisions, SMS and judicial decisions, Technology and access to justice, Videoconferencing and courts, Videoconferencing in courts, Videorecording of court proceedings, Videorecording of judicial proceedings, Videotaping of court proceedings, Videotaping of judicial proceedings, Virtual courts
Posted in Applications, Policy debates, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »