Posts Tagged ‘Daniel Martin Katz’
May 16, 2013
I’ve posted slides of my presentation entitled Legal Informatics Research Today: Implications for Legal Prediction, 3D Printing, and eDiscovery, given 16 May 2013 at CICL 2013: The Fifth Conference on Innovation and Communications Law, 16 May 2013, Glen Arbor, Michigan, sponsored by Michigan State University College of Law.
Here is the abstract:
This presentation describes methodologies and results of recent legal informatics research on eDiscovery and legal prediction, and describes two possible scenarios for the application of legal technology to 3D printing. In addition, the presentation describes a four-level framework that enables comparison of legal informatics research studies in different areas.
I thank Professor Adam Candeub of Michigan State University College of Law for inviting me to give this presentation.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:3D printing, 3D printing and legal technology, Adam Candeub, Automated determination of patent infringement, Automated patent information retrieval, Automated patent search, CICL, CICL 2013, Conference on Innovation and Communications Law, Daniel Martin Katz, ediscovery, ediscovery systems, ediscovery technology, Electronic discovery, Josh Blackman, Joshua Blackman, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal informatics research, Legal prediction, Machine learning and ediscovery, Methodologies in legal informatics ressearch, Modeling patent claims, Predictive coding, Quantitative legal prediction, Unbundling patent law services
Posted in Applications, Methodology, Research findings, Slides, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
April 26, 2013
The CodeX FutureLaw 2013 Conference is being held 26 April 2013 at Stanford Law School, Stanford, California, USA.
The conference focuses ‘on how technology is changing the landscape of the legal profession and the law more broadly. The conference will bring together leading thinkers, entrepreneurs, investors and technologists that are experimenting and actively working to re-architect the future of the law. If you’re of a similar mind, we’d love to have you there.’
Click here for the conference program.
The Twitter hashtag for the conference is #futurelaw
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the conference, in .csv format.
The conference Chair was Tim Hwang.
The legal informatics-oriented panels at the conference include:
- Legal Disruption: Why Now? Why Here? What Next?
- Computational Law and Contracts
- Designing Legal Data
- Open Source Legal Practice
Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz of Michigan State University and the ReInventLaw Lab will give the closing keynote address.
The conference is sponsored by CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics.
Please see the comments to this post for additional resources related to the conference.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Free access to law, Legal informatics conferences, Law practice technology, Contract information systems, Legal technology innovation, Daniel Martin Katz, CodeX, Ed Walters, Public access to legal information, Open legal data, Modeling contracts, Contract law information systems, Modeling legal rules, Tim Hwang, Quantitative legal prediction, Tim Stanley, CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, Innovation in legal technology, Free law, #freelaw, Law practice innovation, Innovation in law practice, Tony Lai, CodeX FutureLaw 2013, CodeX FutureLaw, CodeX FutureLaw Conference, CodeX FutureLaw Conference 2013, Stanford CodeX, Legal data, Itai Gurari, Daniel Lewis, #futurelaw, Stanford Center for Legal Informatics
Posted in Conference Announcements, Tweet archives, Conference resources | 6 Comments »
April 3, 2013
The ReInventLaw Channel is now available, providing access to videos of presentations given at ReInventLaw conferences.
The presentations cover topics including innovation in legal technology and legal services delivery.
The channel currently includes videos of presentations given at ReInventLaw Silicon Valley 2013 and LawTechCamp London 2012.
The channel is produced by the ReInventLaw Lab at Michigan State University College of Law.
HT @computational
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Daniel Martin Katz, Innovation in law practice, Innovation in legal services delivery, Innovation in legal technology, Law practice innovation, Legal informatics conferences, Legal technology innovation, ReInventLaw Channel, ReInventLaw Laboratory, Renee Knake, Renee Newman Knake, Technology and access to justice
Posted in Conference proceedings, Conference resources, Presentations, Videos | Leave a Comment »
March 24, 2013
Proposals are now invited for talks at the ReInventLaw London 2013 Conference, to be held 14 June 2013, in London, England.
The proposal submission deadline is 5 April 2013.
The conference is organized by Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz and Professor Renee Newman Knake of the ReInventLaw Laboratory at Michigan State University College of Law.
Talks will be chosen by a crowdsourced voting process.
Here are the proposal guidelines:
Talks must relate to some aspect of law + technology + innovation + entrepreneurship.
This is about big ideas—no sales pitches or product pushing.
Submit a talk pitch of 300 words or a link to a 30 second YouTube video by midnight April 5, 2013.
Voting opens after submission window is complete at http://www.ReInventLawLondon.com
One person, one vote—but feel free to encourage colleagues, friends, family and more to vote for your pitch!
Winners will have up to 10 minutes to speak, and will then respond to dynamic, real-time, audience-driven Q&A. [...]
For more details, please see the conference Website.
HT @reneeknake
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:#reinventlaw, #reinventlawlondon, Daniel Martin Katz, Innovation in law practice, Innovation in legal education, Innovation in legal educational technology, Innovation in legal instructional technology, Innovation in legal services delivery, Innovation in legal technology, Law practice innovation, Law practice technology, Legal educational technology, Legal informatics conferences, Legal instructional technology, Legal services delivery innovation, Legal services innovation, Legal technology innovation, ReInventLaw Laboratory, ReInventLaw London, ReInventLaw London 2013, Renee Knake, Renee Newman Knake
Posted in Calls for proposals, Conference Announcements | 1 Comment »
March 7, 2013
Tags:Legal informatics conferences, Legal social media, Technology and legal services, Legal technology innovation, Daniel Martin Katz, Law practice innovation, Renee Newman Knake, Innovation in legal services delivery, ReInventLaw Laboratory, ReInventLaw Silicon Valley Unconference, ReInventLaw Silicon Valley 2013 Unconference, Legal informatics unconferences Legal technology unconferences, ReInventLawChannel, ReInventLawChannel.com
Posted in Conference Announcements, Tweet archives, Conference resources | 29 Comments »
February 2, 2013
Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz of Michigan State University College of Law and Michael Bommarito of Computational Legal Studies have posted slides of their 2013 Legal Tech New York presentation entitled 3 Thoughts on E-Discovery in 2015 and Beyond.
The slides address topics including predictive coding, machine learning, information visualization, pattern recognition, and “scaling relationships,” including scaling involving costs of computer processing and rates of growth of electronically stored information.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Daniel Martin Katz, ediscovery, Electronic discovery, Legal evidence information systems, Legal Tech New York, LTNY, Machine learning in ediscovery, Michael Bommarito, Pattern recognition in ediscovery, Predictive coding, Predictive coding in ediscovery, Visualization of evidentiary information, Visualization of information in ediscovery, Visualization of legal information
Posted in Presentations, Slides | Leave a Comment »
January 27, 2013
Registration is now open for ReInventLaw Silicon Valley 2013: a conference on “technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship in the legal services industry,” to be held 8 March 2013, in Mountain View, California, USA.
The Twitter hashtag for the event is #reinventlaw
The speakers for the event have also been announced.
The event is sponsored by The ReInvent Law Laboratory at Michigan State University College of Law and is organized by the Reinvent Law Lab‘s co-directors, Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz and Professor Renee Newman Knake.
Admission is free.
The event description says that “anyone interested in the future of law or technology or entrepreneurship will want to participate. Come hear about the innovative ideas generated by the highly-engaging atmosphere of the event!”
For more information, please see the event’s Website.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Daniel Martin Katz, Innovation in legal services delivery, Law practice innovation, Legal informatics conferences, Legal informatics unconferences Legal technology unconferences, Legal social media, Legal technology innovation, ReInventLaw Laboratory, ReInventLaw Silicon Valley 2013 Unconference, ReInventLaw Silicon Valley Unconference, Renee Newman Knake, Technology and legal services
Posted in Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
December 20, 2012
Nicola Lettieri of ISFOL and Sebastiano Faro of ITTIG-CNR have published Computational Social Science and its Potential Impact upon Law, European Journal of Law and Technology, 3(3) (2012).
Here is the abstract:
Over the past decades, social sciences have gradually learned to use quantitative methods and computational tools. According to the emerging paradigm of so called “computational social science” (CSS), the study of social phenomena is more and more often identified with the use of statistical and analytical tools, with data mining techniques and with the construction of simulation models, in other words, with computation.
Law has substantially fallen behind in exploiting the methodological and scientific outcomes of CSS research. The ongoing change though should involve legal culture for at least two reasons. Firstly, the making, interpretation and application of legal rules conceived to regulate social life cannot ignore the scientific knowledge and methodologies illuminating social dynamics at both individual and collective level. Secondly, CSS are going to provide lawyers with methods and tools offering new scientific basis to their findings and their concrete choices in applying and interpreting law.
The goal of the paper is twofold: on the one hand, to present CSS and discuss, in general terms, how it can positively influence law, offering to lawyers new tools and approaches for addressing legal problems; on the other hand, to focus on one of the most interesting research sectors that can take advantage from CSS approaches: the study of support methodologies and tools for policy making.
The article cites research by Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz, Professor Seth Chandler, and Michael Bommarito, among others.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Computational social sciences and legal research, Computational social sciences methods and legal informatics research, Daniel Martin Katz, EJLT, European Journal of Law and Technology, Legal citation network analysis, Legal citation networks, Legal informatics research, Methodologies in legal informatics, Michael Bommarito, Nicola Lettieri, Sebastiano Faro, Seth Chandler, Social network analysis in legal informatics
Posted in Applications, Methodology | Leave a Comment »
December 14, 2012
Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz of the Michigan State University College of Law and the ReInvent Law Laboratory has published Quantitative Legal Prediction – or – How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Start Preparing for the Data Driven Future of the Legal Services Industry, forthcoming in Emory Law Journal.
Here is the abstract:
Do I Have a Case? What is Our Likely Exposure? How much is this Going to Cost? What will happen if we leave this particular provision out of this contract? How can we best staff this particular legal matter? These are core questions asked by sophisticated clients such as general counsels as well as consumers at the retail level. Whether generated by a mental model or a sophisticated algorithm, prediction is a core component of the guidance that lawyers offer. Indeed, it is by generating informed answers to these types of questions that many lawyers earn their respective wage.
Every single day lawyers and law firms are providing predictions to their clients regarding their prospects in litigation and the cost associated with its pursuit (defense). How are these predictions being generated? Precisely what data or model is being leveraged? Could a subset of these predictions be improved by access to outcome data in a large number of ‘similar’ cases. Simply put, the answer is yes. Quantitative legal prediction already plays a significant role in certain practice areas and this role is likely increase as greater access to appropriate legal data becomes available.
This article is dedicated to highlighting the coming age of Quantitative Legal Prediction with hopes that practicing lawyers, law students and law schools will take heed and prepare to survive (thrive) in this new ordering. Simply put, most lawyers, law schools and law students are going to have to do more to prepare for the data driven future of this industry. In other words, welcome to Law’s Information Revolution and yeah – there is going to be math on the exam.
Click here for slides from the presentation version of the paper, Quantitative Legal Prediction.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Artificial intelligence and law, Automatic creation of legal documents, Automatic creation of legal memoranda, Automatic creation of legal memos, Computation Legal Studies, Daniel Martin Katz, Disintermediation of lawyers, Emory Law Journal, Free access to law, Law.gov, PACER, Public access to legal information, Quantitative legal prediction, RECAP, Statistical methods in legal informatics, Statistical modeling of court decisions, Statistical modeling of legal information, Statistical modeling of similar court decisions, Statistical modeling of statutes
Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
December 11, 2012
Tags:#reinventlawdubai, Daniel Martin Katz, Innovation in legal technology, Law practice innovation, Law practice technology, Legal educational reform, Legal informatics conferences, Legal informatics unconferences, Legal technology innovation, Legal technology unconferences, Quantitative legal prediction, ReInvent Law a law laboratory devoted to innovation technology and entrepreneurship, ReInvent Law Dubai, ReInvent Law Dubai 2012, ReInventLaw Dubai, ReInventLaw Dubai 2012, Renee Newman Knake, Seth Chandler, Seth J. Chandler
Posted in Conference resources, Tweet archives | Leave a Comment »