Tag Archives: Legal evidence information systems

Edmond and Vuille : Comparing the Use of Forensic Science Evidence in Australia, Switzerland, and the U.S.

Gary Edmond and Joëlle Vuille have published Comparing the Use of Forensic Science Evidence in Australia, Switzerland, and the United States: Transcending the Adversarial-Nonadversarial Dichotomy, Jurimetrics Journal, 54, 221–276 (2014). Here is the abstract: This article compares responses to incriminating … Continue reading

Posted in Articles and papers, Policy debates | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Satterthwaite and Simeone: A Conceptual Roadmap for Social Science Methods in Human Rights Advocacy

Margaret L. Satterthwaite of New York University School of Law and Justin Simeone of Princeton University have posted An Emerging Fact-Finding Discipline? A Conceptual Roadmap for Social Science Methods in Human Rights Advocacy, forthcoming in Philip Alston and Sarah Knuckey … Continue reading

Posted in Articles and papers, Chapters, Methodology, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vlek et al.: Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: A case study evaluation

Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, and Bart Verheij, have published Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation, forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Here is the abstract: In a criminal trial, evidence is … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Case studies, Methodology, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Surden: Machine Learning and Law

Professor Harry Surden of the University of Colorado has published Machine Learning and Law, Washington Law Review, 89, 87-115 (2014). Here is the abstract: This Article explores the application of machine learning techniques within the practice of law. Broadly speaking … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Methodology, Technology developments | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kwecka et al. on privacy enhancing technologies

Zbigniew Kwecka, Professor Dr. William Buchanan, Professor Burkhard Schafer, and Judith Rauhofer have published “I am Spartacus”: privacy enhancing technologies, collaborative obfuscation and privacy as a public good, forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Here is the abstract: The paper … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Law Meets Big Data: Los Angeles Legal Innovation Meetup Event, 27 January 2014

Law Meets Big Data was the topic of the Los Angeles Legal Innovation Meetup event held 27 January 2014, at IndieDesk in Los Angeles, California. Lili Daniel has posted a report on the event at the One Legal blog: Big … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Conference reports, Conference resources, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Saks et al.: The Impact of Neuroimages in the Sentencing Phase of Capital Trials

Professor Dr. Michael J. Saks of Arizona State University, Professor Dr. N. J. Schweitzer of Arizona State University, Dr. Eyal Aharoni of the RAND Corporation, and Professor Dr. Kent A. Kiehl of the University of New Mexico have published The … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment