Posts Tagged ‘Legal information retrieval’
March 9, 2013
Dr. Thomas F. Gordon of Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communications Systems (FOKUS) tells us that a call for papers has been issued for a special issue of the journal Artificial Intelligence and Law on the topic, “Computational Methods for Enforcing Privacy and Fairness in the Knowledge Society”.
The submission deadline is 15 April 2013.
Here is an excerpt from the call:
We invite contributions on methodologies, techniques, algorithms, and tools in support of the analysis or of the enforcement of privacy, non-discrimination, and other personal rights in ICT systems for the knowledge society. Special focus is on multi-disciplinary approaches on the following, non-exhaustive, list of topics, and that relate to Artificial Intelligence and Law:
- Methods for enforcing data privacy and anonymity
- Methods for data portability, and for the right to oblivion
- Methods for data protection and law enforcement
- Privacy by-design in intelligent systems
- Privacy-preserving data mining
- Privacy policies in social networks
- Context-aware location privacy
- Methods for unbiased data collection and processing
- Methods for enforcing fairness in profiling and targeting
- Methods for discrimination discovery from data
- Statistical measures of discrimination
- Methods for discrimination prevention in data mining
- Computational argumentation in discrimination analysis
- Design of (quasi-)experimental methods
- Computational models of segregation in social networks
- Computational models of evidential reasoning
- Tools and systems, with case studies [...]
For more details, please see the complete call.
HT Tom Gordon
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Antidiscrimination law enforcement information systems, Antidiscrimination law enforcement systems, Antidiscrimination law information systems, Artificial intelligence and law, Civil rights enforcement information systems, Civil rights information systems, Computational argumentation about discrimination, Constitutional law information systems, Experimental methods in legal informatics, Law enforcement information systems, Law enforcement systems, Legal argumentation, Legal compliance information systems, Legal compliance systems, Legal data mining, Legal data mining for discrimination, Legal data mining for privacy violations, Legal enforcement information systems, Legal enforcement systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal evidentiary reasoning, Legal information retrieval, Legal text mining, Modeling antidiscrimination laws, Modeling antidiscrimination policies, Modeling antidiscrimination rules, Modeling civil rights, Modeling civil rights violations, Modeling civil rights violations in social networks, Modeling discrimination in social networks, Modeling legal argumentation, Modeling legal argumentation about discrimination, Modeling legal evidentiary reasoning, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling privacy laws, Modeling privacy policies, Modeling privacy rules, Modeling segregation in social networks, omputational models of segregation in social networks, PRIVACY, Privacy law enforcement information systems, Privacy law enforcement systems, Privacy law information systems, Quasi-experiments in legal informatics, Quasi-experiments in legal information studies, Thomas F Gordon, Tom Gordon
Posted in Applications, Calls for papers | Leave a Comment »
February 10, 2013
The call for papers and presentation proposals has been issued for LVI 2013: Law via the Internet Conference, to be held 26-27 September 2013 on the Channel Island of Jersey.
The conference Website does not seem to state the deadline for submitting papers or proposals. If you know the submission deadline, please feel free to tell us in the comments to this post.
[UPDATE 11 February 2013: The conference organizers now say the submission deadline is 31 March 2013.]
Papers are invited on the topics covered by any of the seven tracks in which the conference program is divided:
The conference Twitter account is @JerseyLVI2013 and the conference hashtag is #lvi2013
For details about the tracks, please see the track Websites.
For more details about the conference, please see the conference Website.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:#freelaw, Citizens' use of legal information, Digital legal publishing, Distance learning in law schools, e-learning, e-learning in law schools, Effects of free access to law, Effects of public access to legal information, Electronic legal publishing, Free access to law, Free law, Interdisciplinary legal scholarly communication, Law school technology, Law via the Internet Conference, Lawyers' legal information behavior, Lawyers' use of legal information, Legal document standards, Legal information behavior, Legal information institutes, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal knowledge extraction, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal metadata, Legal natural language processing, Legal ontologies, Legal open government data, Legal publishing, Legal reasoning, Legal scholarly communication, Legal scholarly publishing, Legal semantic web, Legal social media, Linked Data and law, LVI, LVI 2013, lvi2013, Modeling legal reasoning, Natural language processing and law, Online legal publishing, Open access legal publishing, Open access to legal scholarship, Open government, Open justice, Personally identifying information and court records, Personally identifying information in court decisions, Personally identifying information in court records, Personally identifying information in judicial decisions, Personally identifying information in legal documents, Privacy and court decisions, Privacy and court documents, Privacy and court records, Privacy and judicial decisions, Privacy and judicial documents, Privacy and legal information, Public access to legal information, Public legal education, Semantic Web and law, Social media and citizens' use of legal information, Social media and lawyers' legal information behavior, Social media and lawyers' use of legal information, Social media and legal information behavior, Social media and legal publishing, Social media and legal scholarly communication, Social media and public legal education, Web 2.0 and citizens' use of legal information, Web 2.0 and lawyers' legal information behavior, Web 2.0 and lawyers' use of legal information, Web 2.0 and legal information behavior, Web 2.0 and legal publishing, Web 2.0 and legal scholarly communication, Web 2.0 and public legal education
Posted in Calls for papers, Calls for proposals, Conference Announcements | 2 Comments »
February 9, 2013
A call for papers — with abstract submission deadline of 28 February 2013 and full paper submission deadline of 15 May 2013 — has been issued for AICOL 2013: Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, to be held at a date to be determined, between 21 and 27 July 2013, in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
The workshop is being collocated with XXVI. World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
Papers for AICOL 2013 are invited on the following topics:
- Law and Science
- Knowledge Management
- Law and Cognitive Science
- Cognitive schemas
- Law and Complexity Theory
- Law and Robotics
- Complex Systems
- Law and Mathematics
- Legal Theory
- Legal Graphic Representation
- Legal Culture
- Game Theory
- Computer Ethics
- Formalization of Legal Systems and Norms
- Artificial Societies
- Rules and Standards
- Argumentative Frameworks
- Agreement technologies
- Legal Ontologies
- Electronic Institutions
- Governance
- Legal Concepts
- Legal Information Retrieval
- Legal Thesauri
- Online Dispute Resolution
- Taxonomies
- Trends in e-Discovery, e-Courts, e-Administration
- Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Legal Knowledge Acquisition
- Users’ studies
- Legal Knowledge Representation
For more details, please see the call.
HT Professor Dr. Monica Palmirani
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:User studies, Legal ontologies, Legal knowledge representation, Legal informatics conferences, ediscovery, Legal information behavior, Online dispute resolution, Legal information retrieval, Legal knowledge management, Artificial intelligence and law, Natural language processing and law, Electronic discovery, Judicial information systems, Visualization of legal information, Contract information systems, Legal concepts, Legal theory, Legal evidence information systems, Legal natural language processing, Legal knowledge acquisition, Court information systems, AICOL, Robotics and law, Robots and law, Legal information user studies, Legal philosophy, Modeling legal norms, Legal thesauri, Game theory and legal information systems, Modeling legal rules, Legal taxonomies, Monica Palmirani, Argumentation frameworks and law, ecourts, Law and robotics, Law and robots, Virtual courts, Modeling legal systems, Virtual court proceedings, AICOL 2013, Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, Cognitive science and legal information systems, Cognitive schemas and legal information systems, Legal cognitive schemas, Complexity theory and legal informatics, Complexity theory and legal information systems, Complex systems and legal information, Complex legal information systems, Legal information systems and complexity, Complexity and law, Graphic representation of legal information, Legal graphic representation, Gamification of legal information systems, Formalization of legal rules, Formalization of legal norms, Formalization of legal systems, Artificial societies and legal information systems, Legal argumentation frameworks, Legal agreement technologies, Digital institutions, Electronic institutions, Electronic legal institutions, Digital legal institutions, Electronic courts, Digital courts, Online court proceedings, Online judicial proceedings, Virtual judicial proceedings, Studies of legal information use
Posted in Conference Announcements, Calls for papers | Leave a Comment »
February 2, 2013
Guillaume Adreani of AHJUCAF has published Retour d’expérience sur Juricaf, la base de données de jurisprudence francophone, Revue générale du droit, January 2013.
The post describes the technology and functionality of Juricaf, the free and open database of francophone supreme court decisions, with particular emphasis on its use of open source software — including Apache Solr and CouchDB — its exposure of metadata in several formats including Dublin Core, its use of schema.org microdata, and the compatibility of its metadata with the Zotero open source citation management system.
Here are excerpts from the introduction:
Juricaf est une base de données de décisions de justice en français accessible gratuitement à l’adresse . Créée à l’initiative de l’AHJUCAF, l’association des cours de cassation francophones et réalisée par le Laboratoire Normologie, linguistique et informatique du Droit de l’Université de Paris I, elle publie à ce jour près de 800 000 documents issus de 42 pays et institutions francophones. Elle bénéficie également du soutien de l’Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. [...]
Quels sont les facteurs-clés pour la réussite d’un tel projet ?
Le moteur de recherche est au cœur d’un tel outil. Ses performances sont liées à l’utilisation d’outils en Open source. Trois autres critères sont déterminants pour que le projet soit crédible :
- Une alimentation en décisions de justice et une mise à jour automatisée,
- L’ajout d’innovations documentaires,
- Une exposition maximale des métadonnées. [...]
For more details, please see the complete article.
HT @adreagui
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AHJUCAF, Apache Solr, CouchDB, CouchDB and legal information systems, Court decisions, Court information systems, Dublin Core and legal information, Dublin Core and legal metadata, Guillaume Adreani, Judicial decisions, Judicial information systems, Juricaf, Legal descriptive metadata, Legal information retrieval, Legal metadata, Open source software in legal information systems, Revue générale du droit, schema.org and legal metadata, Solr and legal information retrieval, Solr and legal information systems, Zotero and legal information, Zotero for law
Posted in Applications, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
January 30, 2013
A call for papers — with submission deadline of 1 May 2013 — has been issued for DESI V: Workshop on Standards for Using Predictive Coding and Other Machine Learning Algorithms, to be held 14 June 2013 in Rome, Italy, following ICAIL 2013: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law.
Papers addressing the following questions are invited for DESI V:
1) How transparent can and should the process be in sharing seed sets or training sets of documents with opposing parties, including the sharing of privileged documents?
2) What differences if any exist between seed sets developed through random sampling versus other forms of judgmental sampling (including picking seed documents using keywords)?
3) How are non-relevant documents used to optimize machine learning algorithms and should they be subject to similar disclosure?
4) Are there ways in which predictive coding and machine learning methods can be tuned to find highly relevant (“hot”) documents in large collections?
5) To what extent is metadata important in tuning predictive coding software to find similarity in documents?
6) In light of past research at the TREC Legal Track and elsewhere, are there absolute targets for metrics in recall and precision that could serve as standards in every case, or are achieving certain metrics dependent on the relevant data set and legal context?
7) What kinds of best practice standards are needed to help improve mutual understanding of what was actually done, and to improve overall “search quality”?
8) How should predictive coding techniques be audited in connection with an entity submitting itself to an ISO 9001 quality measurement process?
9) To what extent can and should machine learning approaches be used in other phases of the litigation process, to assist in aspects of the process such as identification, preservation, and collection?
10)What are the applications of predictive coding and other forms of machine learning in related “compliance” areas, including regulatory, enforcement, and investigations?
The workshop discussion will be grounded in the results of the recently completed TREC Legal Track, especially where supervised learning methods have shown promising results in terms of being able to more cost-effectively demonstrate rates of recall and precision that approximate the best that could be obtained through other methods, including exhaustive manual review.
For more details, please see the complete call.
HT Jurix.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:DESI, DESI V, ediscovery, Electronic discovery, ICAIL, ICAIL 2013, Legal compliance systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal information retrieval, Legal machine learning, Legal metadata, Litigation information systems, Machine learning in ediscovery, Machine learning in legal compliance, Machine learning in legal compliance systems, Machine learning in legal evidence information systems, Machine learning in legal information retrieval, Predictive coding, Predictive coding in ediscovery, Predictive coding in legal compliance, Predictive coding in legal compliance systems, TREC Legal Track, Trial practice information systems, Workshop on Standards for Using Predictive Coding and Other Machine Learning Algorithms
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
January 30, 2013
The 2013 TREC Legal Track has been cancelled “because of ongoing unspecified problems with the data set,” Evan Koblentz reports TREC Legal Track co-organizer Professor Dr. Gordon Cormack as having said after a 29 January 2013 panel at the Legal Tech New York conference, according to Koblentz’s article, “LegalTech Day One: Relativity 8, Statistical Sampling, Law Firm Security,” Law Technology News, 30 January 2013.
This would be the second consecutive year in which TREC Legal Track has been cancelled.
The TREC Legal Track is a major legal information retrieval conference. Its findings have contributed substantially to research respecting electronic discovery (ediscovery).
Click here for earlier posts about the TREC Legal Track.
Click here for proceedings of previous years of the TREC Legal Track, contained in the general TREC proceedings.
Click here for published papers that report results of research involving data used in connection with TREC Legal Track.
HT @LawTechEvan
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:2013 TREC Legal Track is reported to have been canceled, ediscovery, Evan Koblentz, Gordon Cormack, Law Technology News, Legal informatics conferences, Legal information retrieval, TREC Legal Track, TREC Legal Track 2013, TREC Legal Track 2013 is reported to have been canceled
Posted in Conference Announcements | 1 Comment »
January 5, 2013
Yen-Liang Chen and Yi-Hung Liu, both of National Central University Department of Information Management, and Wu-Liang Ho of the Straits Exchange Foundation, have published A text mining approach to assist the general public in the retrieval of legal documents, forthcoming in JASIST.
Here is the abstract:
Applying text mining techniques to legal issues has been an emerging research topic in recent years. Although some previous studies focused on assisting professionals in the retrieval of related legal documents, they did not take into account the general public and their difficulty in describing legal problems in professional legal terms. Because this problem has not been addressed by previous research, this study aims to design a text-mining-based method that allows the general public to use everyday vocabulary to search for and retrieve criminal judgments. The experimental results indicate that our method can help the general public, who are not familiar with professional legal terms, to acquire relevant criminal judgments more accurately and effectively.
HT @asist_org
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Experimental methods in legal informatics, JASIST, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Legal information retrieval, Legal text mining, Non-lawyers' legal information retrieval, Public access to legal information, Text mining and legal information retrieval
Posted in Articles and papers, Research findings | Leave a Comment »
December 17, 2012
Tags:Artificial intelligence and law, Bill drafting systems, Burkhard Schafer, Copyright information systems, Court technology, Digital rights management, egovernment, Intellectual property information systems, Interdisciplinary legal informatics research, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Judicial information systems, JURIX, JURIX 2012, Law practice technology, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal compliance information systems, Legal drafting systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal expert systems, Legal expert systems for judges, Legal expert systems for legislators, Legal inference, Legal information management systems, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal intelligent agents, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge management systems, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal ontologies, Legal reasoning, Legal semantic web, Legal XML, Legislative expert systems, Legislative information systems, Legislative XML, Modeling legal actions of digital institutions, Modeling legal actions of intelligent agents, Modeling legal acts, Modeling legal acts of digital institutions, Modeling legal acts of electronic institutions, Modeling legal acts of intelligent agents, Modeling legal argumentation, Modeling legal inference, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling legal rules, Online dispute resolution, Online dispute resolution systems, Public administration information systems, Quality control in legal information systems, Quality control in legal knowledge systems, Regulatory compliance information systems, Regulatory information systems, Semantic Web and law, Tom van Engers, Validating legal knowledge systems, Verifying legal knowledge systems, XML for contracts, XML for court decisions XML for judicial decisions, XML for legal documents, XML for regulations
Posted in Applications, Conference Announcements, Technology developments, Technology tools, Tweet archives | 1 Comment »
October 25, 2012
Dr. Sushant Sinha of Indian Kanoon has posted Faster and More Relevant Kanoon!, at the Indian Kanoon forums.
He writes:
A new release of IndianKanoon brings in the following changes:
1. A new tiering function that slims down the top tier and significantly improves the time taken to execute a query.
2. A new ranking function to improve relevance.
3. Improved word matching and abbreviations. A search of “adm jabalpur” will match “additional district magistrate jabalpur”
http://www.indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=adm+jabalpur
4. New operators ANDD, ORR and NOTT that can be used with words
5. Clicking on a document after a search query shows the contexts in the document in which the query appears.
6. Performance improvements coming from upgrade to Postgresql 9.2
For more information or to provide comments, please see the complete post.
HT @sushantsinha
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Boolean operators in legal information retrieval, Computer assisted legal research, Indian Kanoon, KWIC in legal information retrieval, Legal information retrieval, Legal search, Postgresql in legal search, Relevance in legal information retrieval, Sushant Sinha, Tiering in legal information retrieval
Posted in Applications, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
October 10, 2012
Click here for archived Twitter tweets, in .csv format, from LVI 2012: Law via the Internet Conference, held 7-9 October 2012 at the Legal Information Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Click here for the conference Website.
The Twitter hashtag for the conference is #lvi2012, and the Twitter account for the conference is @LVI2012.
Click here for the conference program and abstracts of presentations.
Some conference sessions will be livestreamed here.
For blog posts and other resources related to the conference, please see the comments to this post.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Free access to law, Legal ontologies, Legal knowledge representation, Legal informatics conferences, Legal informatics, Legal information behavior, Legal information retrieval, egovernment, Legislative information systems, Cross-language legal information systems, Legal metadata, Public access to legal information, Cross-language legal information retrieval, Law via the Internet, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Legal multilingual information retrieval, Legal publishing, Multilingual legal knowledge representation, Cross-language legal knowledge representation, Legal scholarly communication, Digital legal publishing, eparticipation, Interoperability of legal information, Electronic legal publishing, Citizens' participation in lawmaking, Citizens' participation in egovernment, LVI, Crowdsourcing and legal information systems, Open access law journals, LVI 2012, Law via the Internet 2012
Posted in Conference reports, Conference resources, Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts, Tweet archives | 28 Comments »