Posts Tagged ‘Legal semantic web’
April 27, 2013
Linked Data versions of Library of Congress name authority records and subject authority records are now available for bulk download from the Library of Congress Linked Data Service, according to Kevin Ford at Library of Congress.
In addition, VIAF, the Virtual International Authority File, now provides bulk access to Linked Data versions of name authority records for organizations, including government entities and business organizations, from more than 30 national or research libraries. VIAF data are also searchable through the VIAF Web user interface.
Together, these services provide bulk access to Linked Data versions of a very large number of authority records for names of government entities in many countries–names which play a prominent role in many kinds of legal data. Moreover, the Library of Congress Subject Authority records service provides access to a very large set of Linked Data versions of records for legal subjects from many different legal systems; the coverage provided by those records varies from legal system to legal system, but is often very broad and is in some instances comprehensive.
These Linked Data resources can be downloaded and incorporated into new or existing legal information systems that employ Linked Data technology. In addition, because each authority record in these data sets contains a unique URI and is publicly accessible on the Web, legal information systems that employ Linked Data technology can link out to relevant authority records at VIAF or the Library of Congress, as part of the development of the legal portion of the Semantic Web.
Click here for a list of additional law-related Linked Data resources.
HT @3windmills here and here
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Kevin Ford, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal name authority files, Legal name authority records, Legal semantic web, Legal subject headings, Library of Congress Linked Data Service, Library of Congress Name Authority Records, Library of Congress Subject Authority records, Library of Congress Subject Headings, Linked Data and law, Linked Data versions of legal name authority records, Linked Data versions of legal subject authority records, NACO, NACO name authority records, SACO, SACO subject authority records, Semantic Web and law, VIAF
Posted in Data sets | Leave a Comment »
April 12, 2013
Kevin Ford of the Library of Congress has posted Law Classification Added to Library of Congress Linked Data Service, at In Custodia Legis.
Here are excerpts from the post:
The Library of Congress is pleased to make the K Class – Law Classification – and all its subclasses available as linked data from the LC Linked Data Service, ID.LOC.GOV. K Class joins the B, N, M, and Z Classes, which have been in beta release since June 2012. With about 2.2 million new resources added to ID.LOC.GOV, K Class is nearly eight times larger than the B, M, N, and Z Classes combined.[...]
Please explore the K Class for yourself at http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification/K or all of the classes at http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification. [...]
As always, your feedback is important and welcomed. [...] we are particularly interested in how the data available from ID.LOC.GOV is used and continue to encourage the submission of use cases describing how the community would like to apply or repurpose the LCC data. [...]
For more details, please see the complete post.
Click here for other law-related Linked Data resources.
HT @atweber
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:In Custodia Legis, Kevin Ford, Legal classification, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal semantic web, Library of Congress Classification Class K, Linked Data and law, Semantic Web and law
Posted in Data sets | Leave a Comment »
March 18, 2013
Akoma Ntoso’s Website has posted Akoma Ntoso adopted by the Italian Senate.
Here is an excerpt:
Starting from 23 February 2013, all the bills published on the Italian Senate website are available, other than in the usual HTML, PDF, and ePub formats, also in XML, using an Akoma Ntoso compliant scheme.
The Italian Senate, in the wake of the European Parliament, has also joined the growing number of parliaments supporting Akoma Ntoso as common to support more effective management of information and long-term preservation of formal documentation.
Akoma Ntoso is the result of the efforts of the Africa i-Parliaments Action Plan to realize a common standard for the interchange of legal documents among institutions and countries. Building on the opportunities offered by open standards, it aims at supporting the development of high-value parliamentary and legislative information services. [...]
In addition, the Italian Senate has made available a SPARQL endpoint for legislative Linked Data.
HT @cottinstef and @adreagui
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AKOMA NTOSO, Italian Senate, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal metadata, Legal metadata standards, Legal open government data, Legal semantic web, Legal structural metadata, Legal XML, Legislative data, Legislative information systems, Linked Data and law, Open legislative data, Semantic Web and law, Senate of Italy, SPARQL, SPARQL and law, SPARQL and legal information retrieval, SPARQL and legislative data
Posted in Applications, Standards, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
March 1, 2013
María Hallo Carrasco of National Polytechnic School, Ecuador, and Professor Dr. M. Mercedes Martínez-González and Pablo de la Fuente Redondo, both of University of Valladolid, have published Data models for version management of legislative documents, forthcoming in Journal of Information Science.
Here is the abstract:
This paper surveys the main data models used in projects including the management of changes in digital normative legislation. Models have been classified based on a set of criteria, which are also proposed in the paper. Some projects have been chosen as representative for each kind of model. The advantages and problems of each type are analysed, and future trends are identified.
The legislative metadata models discussed in the paper include:
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Agora-Lex, AKOMA NTOSO, CEN Metalex, EnACT, ESTRELLA General XML format(s) for legal Sources, Journal of Information Science, Legal knowledge representation, Legal metadata, Legal metadata models, Legal semantic web, Legal structural metadata, Legal XML, Legislation.gov.uk, Legislative data models, Legislative Documents in XML at the United States House of Representatives, Legislative information systems, Legislative metadata, Legislative metadata models, Legislative semantic web, Legislative version control, Legislative version management, Legislative XML, M. Mercedes Martínez-González, María Hallo Carrasco, Norma, Norma-System, Norme in Rete, Pablo de la Fuente Redondo, Semantic Web and law, Version control of legal documents, Version control of legislation, Version control of legislative documents, Version management of legal documents, Version management of legislation, Version management of legislative documents, xml.house.gov
Posted in Applications, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
February 10, 2013
The call for papers and presentation proposals has been issued for LVI 2013: Law via the Internet Conference, to be held 26-27 September 2013 on the Channel Island of Jersey.
The conference Website does not seem to state the deadline for submitting papers or proposals. If you know the submission deadline, please feel free to tell us in the comments to this post.
[UPDATE 11 February 2013: The conference organizers now say the submission deadline is 31 March 2013.]
Papers are invited on the topics covered by any of the seven tracks in which the conference program is divided:
The conference Twitter account is @JerseyLVI2013 and the conference hashtag is #lvi2013
For details about the tracks, please see the track Websites.
For more details about the conference, please see the conference Website.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:#freelaw, Citizens' use of legal information, Digital legal publishing, Distance learning in law schools, e-learning, e-learning in law schools, Effects of free access to law, Effects of public access to legal information, Electronic legal publishing, Free access to law, Free law, Interdisciplinary legal scholarly communication, Law school technology, Law via the Internet Conference, Lawyers' legal information behavior, Lawyers' use of legal information, Legal document standards, Legal information behavior, Legal information institutes, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal knowledge extraction, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal metadata, Legal natural language processing, Legal ontologies, Legal open government data, Legal publishing, Legal reasoning, Legal scholarly communication, Legal scholarly publishing, Legal semantic web, Legal social media, Linked Data and law, LVI, LVI 2013, lvi2013, Modeling legal reasoning, Natural language processing and law, Online legal publishing, Open access legal publishing, Open access to legal scholarship, Open government, Open justice, Personally identifying information and court records, Personally identifying information in court decisions, Personally identifying information in court records, Personally identifying information in judicial decisions, Personally identifying information in legal documents, Privacy and court decisions, Privacy and court documents, Privacy and court records, Privacy and judicial decisions, Privacy and judicial documents, Privacy and legal information, Public access to legal information, Public legal education, Semantic Web and law, Social media and citizens' use of legal information, Social media and lawyers' legal information behavior, Social media and lawyers' use of legal information, Social media and legal information behavior, Social media and legal publishing, Social media and legal scholarly communication, Social media and public legal education, Web 2.0 and citizens' use of legal information, Web 2.0 and lawyers' legal information behavior, Web 2.0 and lawyers' use of legal information, Web 2.0 and legal information behavior, Web 2.0 and legal publishing, Web 2.0 and legal scholarly communication, Web 2.0 and public legal education
Posted in Calls for papers, Calls for proposals, Conference Announcements | 2 Comments »
December 17, 2012
Tags:Artificial intelligence and law, Bill drafting systems, Burkhard Schafer, Copyright information systems, Court technology, Digital rights management, egovernment, Intellectual property information systems, Interdisciplinary legal informatics research, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Judicial information systems, JURIX, JURIX 2012, Law practice technology, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal compliance information systems, Legal drafting systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal expert systems, Legal expert systems for judges, Legal expert systems for legislators, Legal inference, Legal information management systems, Legal information retrieval, Legal instructional technology, Legal intelligent agents, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge management systems, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal ontologies, Legal reasoning, Legal semantic web, Legal XML, Legislative expert systems, Legislative information systems, Legislative XML, Modeling legal actions of digital institutions, Modeling legal actions of intelligent agents, Modeling legal acts, Modeling legal acts of digital institutions, Modeling legal acts of electronic institutions, Modeling legal acts of intelligent agents, Modeling legal argumentation, Modeling legal inference, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling legal rules, Online dispute resolution, Online dispute resolution systems, Public administration information systems, Quality control in legal information systems, Quality control in legal knowledge systems, Regulatory compliance information systems, Regulatory information systems, Semantic Web and law, Tom van Engers, Validating legal knowledge systems, Verifying legal knowledge systems, XML for contracts, XML for court decisions XML for judicial decisions, XML for legal documents, XML for regulations
Posted in Applications, Conference Announcements, Technology developments, Technology tools, Tweet archives | 1 Comment »
December 13, 2012
Professor Dr. Monica Palmirani, Professor Dr. Ugo Pagallo, Professor Dr. Pompeu Casanovas, and Professor Dr. Giovanni Sartor, have edited a new book entitled AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems – Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents (Springer, 2012).
The book contains revised selected papers from International Workshop AICOL-III, Held as Part of the 25th IVR Congress, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, August 15-16, 2011.
HT Professor Palmirani
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AICOL, AICOL 2011, AICOL III, Digital legal publishing, Electronic legal publishing, Enrico Francesconi, Free access to law, Ginevra Peruginelli, Giovanni Sartor, International Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, Legal agent based systems, Legal information institutes, Legal multiagent systems, Legal network analysis, Legal ontologies, Legal publishing, Legal scholarly publishing, Legal scholarship, Legal semantic web, Monica Palmirani, Network analysis and law, Open access to legal scholarship, Pompeu Casanovas, Public access to legal information, Radboud Winkels, Semantic Web and law, Ugo Pagallo
Posted in Applications, Conference papers, Conference proceedings, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
November 28, 2012
Marc van Opijnen of the The Netherlands Council for the Judiciary (Raad Voor de Rechtspraak) has posted the full text of his paper entitled The European Legal Semantic Web: Completed Building Blocks and Future Work, given last week at Journées européennes d’informatique 2012 = European Legal e-Access Conference.
Here is the abstract:
If constructed properly the European legal semantic web will improve access to legal information, stimulate innovative applications and legal services, and reinforce judicial and legal cooperation within Europe.
In this paper we will discuss why we still we do not have one-click answers on very basic legal questions, what building blocks are already in place and what still has to be done to have the European Legal Semantic Web really functioning.
We will start with some illustrations from legal practice to demonstrate the blessings of the semantic web, and the definition of some terminology (§ 1). Next, we will review the state of play regarding the most important building blocks for identifying legal sources (§ 2). In § 3 we will summarize the most necessary steps that have to be taken in the near future, both at European and national level, to make substantial headway. One of these steps might be the development of a European Legal Doctrine Identifier.
Some concluding remarks are made in § 4.
Among the resources discussed in the paper are:
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:CELEX, Citation of legal authorities, ECLI, ELI, EUR-Lex, European Case-Law Identifier, European Legal e-Access Conference, European Legal e-Access Conference 2012, European legal semantic web, European Legislation Identifier, Journées européennes d’informatique, Journées européennes d’informatique 2012, Legal citation, Legal descriptive metadata, Legal identifiers, Legal metadata, Legal metadata standards, Legal ontologies, Legal semantic web, Marc van Opijnen, Semantic Web and European law, Semantic Web and law
Posted in Applications, Conference papers, Standards, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
November 22, 2012
A call for papers — with submission deadline of 26 November 2012 — has been issued for the Jurix 2012 workshop entitled Legal Resources from Text to Rules, to be held 20 December 2012 in Amsterdam.
The workshop is being held in conjunction with JURIX 2012: International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, being held 17-20 December 2012 at Leibniz Center for Law, University of Amsterdam.
Here are details of the workshop:
The time is ripe for investigating the connections between the representation of legal XML texts and their formalization as legal rules.
For years these two communities have pursued their goals separately, but now emerging XML-based standards oriented both to legal documents (Akoma Ntoso, CEN Metalex, national XML standards, etc.) and to legal rules (LKIF, RuleML, RIF, SWRL, LegalRuleML, etc.) justify the possibility to combine techniques and foster their concrete application in the society (compliance, eGov services, legislative drafting, policy making applications, digital legal libraries, etc.).
This workshop aims to examine the relationship between legal computable ontologies as bridges from legal concepts and their legal texts and legal rules (predicates). Hybrid platform where ontologies are used to support legal reasoning and to create bidirectional dialogues with legal knowledge bases are part within the workshop scope.
Questions we will try to address:
- Are the statuses of legal XML standards fixed? What are the next steps?
- Are legal rules autonomous or they need to link their evidences to the text for support?
- Are multiple interpretations of a legal text possible without affecting its representations as legal XML documents?
- What are the roles of the legal ontologies and of semantic web (especially Linked Data) technologies in this scenario?
Proponents: Monica Palmirani, Fabio Vitali, Enrico Francesconi, Tom van Engers, Radboud Winkels
Selected papers will be published in the AICOL IV volume by the end of 2013, after a double peer-review process.
For more information, please see the call for papers.
HT Professor Palmirani
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AKOMA NTOSO, CEN Metalex, Enrico Francesconi, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interpretation of legal language, Interpretation of legal texts, JURIX, JURIX 2012, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal metadata, Legal metadata standards, Legal ontologies, Legal Resources From Text to Rules, Legal semantic web, Legal structural metadata, Legal text interpretation, Legal text representation, Legal XML, LegalRuleML, Linked Data and law, LKIF, Modeling legal rules, Monica Palmirani, Radboud Winkels, Representation of legal rules, Representation of legal texts, RIF, RuleML, Semantic Web and law, SWRL
Posted in Applications, Calls for papers, Conference Announcements, Standards | Leave a Comment »
September 2, 2012
Professor Dr. Monica Palmirani, Tommaso Ognibene, and Luca Cervone, all of CIRSFID, University of Bologna, presented a paper entitled Legal Rules, Text and Ontologies Over Time, at RuleML2012@ECAI Challenge, held 27-29 August 2012 in Montpellier, France.
Here is the abstract:
The current paper presents the “Fill the gap” project that aims to design a set of XML standards for modelling legal documents in the Semantic Web over time. The goal of the project is to design an information system using XML standards able to store in an XML-native database legal resources and legal rules in an integrated way for supporting legal knowledge engineers and end-users (e.g., public administrative officers, judges, citizens).
According to Professor Palmirani, this paper won an award as one of the two best demo papers of the RuleML2012 Challenge.
Click here for the complete proceedings of RuleML2012@ECAI Challenge and Doctoral Consortium.
HT Professor Palmirani
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Fill the Gap in the Legal Knowledge Modelling, International Symposium on Rules, Legal knowledge representation, Legal ontologies, Legal semantic web, LegalRuleML, Luca Cervone, Modeling legal knowledge, Modeling legal rules, Monica Palmirani, RuleML, RuleML 2012, RuleML @ ECAI Challenge, Semantic Web and law, Tommaso Ognibene
Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers | Leave a Comment »