Posts Tagged ‘Legal taxonomies’
April 30, 2013
Serena Manzoli, LL.M., has published Taxonomies Make the Law. Will Folksonomies Change It?, at VoxPopuLII.
Here are excerpts from the post:
[...] the problems with legal taxonomies occur when the creators and the users don’t share the same frame of mind. And this is most likely to happen when the creators of the taxonomy are lawyers and the users are not lawyers. [...]
Let’s come to folksonomies now. Here, the mismatch between creators (lawyers) and users’ way of reasoning is less likely to occur. The very same users decide which category to create and what to put into it. Moreover, more tags can overlap; that is, the same object can be tagged more than once. This allows the user to consider the same object from different perspectives. [...]‘
What legal folksonomies bring us is:
- User-centered categories
- Flexible categorization systems. Many items can be tagged more than once and so be put into different categories. Legal stuff can be retrieved through different routes but also considered under different lights.
Will this enhance findability? I think it will, especially if the users are non-lawyers. And services that target the low-end of the legal market usually target non-lawyers. [...]
Prediction #1: Folksonomies will provide the right information architecture for non-legal users. [...]
Prediction #2: legal folksonomies in legal teaching would keep lawyers’ minds flexible. [...]
Prediction #3 Legal folksonomies will make the law apply differently.
Let’s wait and see. Let the users tag. Where this tagging is going to take us is unpredictable, yes, but if you look at where taxonomies have taken us for all these years, you may find a clue.
I have a gut feeling that folksonomies are going to change the way we search, teach, and apply the law.
For more details, please see the complete post.
HT @squarelaw
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Crowdsourcing and legal information, Crowdsourcing and legal information systems, Legal classification, Legal folksonomies, Legal knowledge representation, Legal subject classification, Legal taxonomies, Serena Manzoli, VoxPopuLII
Posted in Applications, Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts | Leave a Comment »
April 20, 2013
The new issue of Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (10(2), June 2013) includes several articles on legal information or decision making:
HT @aabibliographer
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Citation of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, Coherence based legal reasoning, Forensic identification evidence, Identification evidence, Influence of affirmative action on learning in law schools, Influences on learning in law schools, Intuition in jurors' legal decision making, Intuition in jurors' legal reasoning, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Jurors' attitudes towards DNA evidence, Jurors' coherence based legal reasoning, Jurors' evaluation of DNA evidence, Jurors' legal reasoning, Learning in law schools, Legal citation, Legal citation analysis, Legal citation studies, Legal communication, Legal evidence information systems, Legal reasoning, Legal standards of proof, Legal taxonomies, Litigation taxonomies, Taxonomies of causes of action, Taxonomies of litigation, U.S. Supreme Court
Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
February 9, 2013
A call for papers — with abstract submission deadline of 28 February 2013 and full paper submission deadline of 15 May 2013 — has been issued for AICOL 2013: Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, to be held at a date to be determined, between 21 and 27 July 2013, in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
The workshop is being collocated with XXVI. World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
Papers for AICOL 2013 are invited on the following topics:
- Law and Science
- Knowledge Management
- Law and Cognitive Science
- Cognitive schemas
- Law and Complexity Theory
- Law and Robotics
- Complex Systems
- Law and Mathematics
- Legal Theory
- Legal Graphic Representation
- Legal Culture
- Game Theory
- Computer Ethics
- Formalization of Legal Systems and Norms
- Artificial Societies
- Rules and Standards
- Argumentative Frameworks
- Agreement technologies
- Legal Ontologies
- Electronic Institutions
- Governance
- Legal Concepts
- Legal Information Retrieval
- Legal Thesauri
- Online Dispute Resolution
- Taxonomies
- Trends in e-Discovery, e-Courts, e-Administration
- Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Legal Knowledge Acquisition
- Users’ studies
- Legal Knowledge Representation
For more details, please see the call.
HT Professor Dr. Monica Palmirani
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AICOL, AICOL 2013, Argumentation frameworks and law, Artificial intelligence and law, Artificial societies and legal information systems, Cognitive schemas and legal information systems, Cognitive science and legal information systems, Complex legal information systems, Complex systems and legal information, Complexity and law, Complexity theory and legal informatics, Complexity theory and legal information systems, Contract information systems, Court information systems, Digital courts, Digital institutions, Digital legal institutions, ecourts, ediscovery, Electronic courts, Electronic discovery, Electronic institutions, Electronic legal institutions, Formalization of legal norms, Formalization of legal rules, Formalization of legal systems, Game theory and legal information systems, Gamification of legal information systems, Graphic representation of legal information, Judicial information systems, Law and robotics, Law and robots, Legal agreement technologies, Legal argumentation frameworks, Legal cognitive schemas, Legal concepts, Legal evidence information systems, Legal graphic representation, Legal informatics conferences, Legal information behavior, Legal information retrieval, Legal information systems and complexity, Legal information user studies, Legal knowledge acquisition, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge representation, Legal natural language processing, Legal ontologies, Legal philosophy, Legal taxonomies, Legal theory, Legal thesauri, Modeling legal norms, Modeling legal rules, Modeling legal systems, Monica Palmirani, Natural language processing and law, Online court proceedings, Online dispute resolution, Online judicial proceedings, Robotics and law, Robots and law, Studies of legal information use, User studies, Virtual court proceedings, Virtual courts, Virtual judicial proceedings, Visualization of legal information, Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
November 17, 2012
Tags:CALI, CALI Taxonomy, Center for Computer Assisted Legal Instruction, Drupal and legal information systems, Drupal taxonomies, Drupal taxonomies and law, Elmer Masters, Legal knowledge representation, Legal subject headings, Legal taxonomies
Posted in Applications | Leave a Comment »
April 22, 2012
The DGT Multilingual Translation Memory of the Acquis Communautaire: DGT-TM — a parallel corpus of all European Union legislation, called the Acquis Communautaire, translated into all 22 languages of the EU nations — has been expanded to include EU legislation from 2004-2010, according to an April 2012 announcement on the DGT-TM Website. The updated corpus is called DGT-TM-2011.
The new content comes from the EU Official Journal Series L, 2004-2010.
According to the announcement, DGT-TM-2011 is the largest parallel corpus in the world, and is intended to be used for the following purposes:
- training automatic systems for statistical machine translation (SMT);
- producing monolingual or multilingual lexical and semantic resources such as dictionaries and ontologies;
- training and testing multilingual information extraction software;
- checking translation consistency automatically;
- testing and benchmarking alignment software (for sentences, words, etc.).
The DGT-TM-2011 should be a valuable resource for legal informatics and legal linguistics research and development.
For more information, please see:
HT @moximer.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Acquis Communautaire, Corpora of legal texts, Corpora of legislative texts, Cross-language legal information systems, DGT-TM, DGT-TM-2011, EU, EU Official Journal, EU Official Journal Series L, European Commission Directorate General for Translation, European Union, European Union Legislation, Legal information extraction, Legal linguistics, Legal machine learning, Legal ontologies, Legal parallel corpora, Legal taxonomies, Legal text mining, Legal textual corpora, Legal translation, Legislative corpora, Multilingual legal dictionaries
Posted in Data sets | Leave a Comment »
February 19, 2011
A call for papers — with submission deadline of 16 May 2011 — has been issued for AICOL 2011: The Third Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Law, to be held 16 August 2011 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
The workshop is to be held in conjunction with IVR 2011: XXV. World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
Papers for AICOL 2011 are invited on the following topics:
- Law and Science
- Law and Cognitive Science
- Law and Complexity Theory
- Complex Systems
- Legal Theory
- Legal Culture
- Computer Ethics
- Artificial Societies
- Argumentative Frameworks
- Legal Ontologies
- Legal Concepts
- Legal Thesauri
- Taxonomies
- Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Legal Knowledge Acquisition
- Legal Knowledge Representation
- Knowledge Management
- Cognitive schemas
- Law and Robotics
- Law and Mathematics
- Legal Graphic Representation
- Game Theory
- Formalization of Legal Systems and Norms
- Rules and Standards
- Agreement technologies
- Electronic Institutions
- Legal Information Retrieval
- Online Dispute Resolution
- Trends in e-Discovery, e-Courts, e-Administration
- Users’ studies
HT Professor Dr. Monica Palmirani.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AICOL, Argumentation frameworks and law, Artificial intelligence and law, Court information systems, Court technology, ecommerce, ecommerce systems, econtracting systems, ecourts, ediscovery, Electronic commerce systems, Electronic contract information systems, Electronic contracting systems, Electronic discovery, Judicial information systems, Law as a complex adaptive system, Law as a complex system, Legal argument, Legal argumentation, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal information behavior, Legal information retrieval, Legal knowledge representation, Legal metadata, Legal natural language processing, Legal online dispute resolution, Legal ontologies, Legal philosophy, Legal taxonomies, Legal theory, Modeling of legal norms, Modeling of legal rules, Natural language processing and law, Online dispute resolution, Robotics and law, Robots and law, Visualization of legal information, Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Law
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | 1 Comment »
January 16, 2011
Tags:Automatic classification of legal documents, Automatic updating of legal documents, Burden of proof, Conflict of laws information systems, Factors in legal case based reasoning, Inference in legal evidence information systems, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interoperability of legal thesauri, JURIX, JURIX 2010, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal burden of proof, Legal case based reasoning, Legal case frames, Legal citation standards, Legal citation systems, Legal citations, Legal deliberation, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal rhetoric, Legal taxonomies, Legal thesauri, LKIF Rule, Modeling burdens of proof, Modeling conflicts of law rules, Modeling legal citations, Modeling legal rules, Online legal deliberation, Semantic analysis of legal documents, Semantic analysis of legal texts, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science
Posted in Applications, Conference papers, Conference proceedings, Slides, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
December 15, 2010
Tags:Automatic classification of legal documents, Automatic updating of legal documents, Burden of proof, Conflict of laws information systems, Factors in legal case based reasoning, Inference in legal evidence information systems, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interoperability of legal thesauri, JURIX, JURIX 2010, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal burden of proof, Legal case based reasoning, Legal case frames, Legal citation standards, Legal citation systems, Legal citations, Legal deliberation, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal rhetoric, Legal taxonomies, Legal thesauri, LKIF Rule, Modeling burdens of proof, Modeling conflicts of law rules, Modeling legal citations, Modeling legal rules, Online legal deliberation, Semantic analysis of legal documents, Semantic analysis of legal texts, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science
Posted in Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
October 9, 2010
Tags:Automatic classification of legal documents, Automatic updating of legal documents, Burden of proof, Conflict of laws information systems, Factors in legal case based reasoning, Inference in legal evidence information systems, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interoperability of legal thesauri, JURIX, JURIX 2010, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal burden of proof, Legal case based reasoning, Legal case frames, Legal citation standards, Legal citation systems, Legal citations, Legal deliberation, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal rhetoric, Legal taxonomies, Legal thesauri, LKIF Rule, Modeling burdens of proof, Modeling conflicts of law rules, Modeling legal citations, Modeling legal rules, Online legal deliberation, Semantic analysis of legal documents, Semantic analysis of legal texts, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science
Posted in Articles and papers, Conference papers | Leave a Comment »
June 15, 2010
A call for papers — with submission deadlines of 1 August 2010 for full papers, and 1 September 2010 for practitioner presentations, research in progress, and posters — has been issued for ICKM 2010: The 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management, to be held 22-23 October 2010, at The Hilton Pittsburgh, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
The conference is collocated with ASIST 2010: The American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting.
Papers for ICKM 2010 are invited on the following topics:
- Indigenous Knowledge Management
- Communication, Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing
- Intellectual Capital & KM Measurements
- Knowledge Discovery (AI, Data Mining, Text & Web Mining)
- Knowledge Organization (Meta Data, Taxonomies & Ontology)
- Knowledge Retention, Policies and Practices
- Knowledge Management in Project Management
- Knowledge Management in Healthcare
- Knowledge Management in Public Sector and Not-For-Profit Organizations
- Knowledge Management Strategies and Implementations
- Knowledge Management Training and Certification
- Learning Organization & Organizational Learning
- Web 2.0 and Social Networking Technologies
- Information Architecture, Content & Digital Right Management
- Knowledge Management in Libraries and Information Centers
- Knowledge Loss and Brain Drain in Turbulent Economic Times
- Social and Ethical Issues
- The Challenges of Complexity
For more information, please see the call for papers.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Artificial intelligence and law, Complex adaptive systems and law, Digital rights management, ICKM, ICKM 2010, International Conference on Knowledge Management, Law as a complex adaptive system, Law as a complex system, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge representation, Legal metadata, Legal ontologies, Legal social media, Legal social networks, Legal taxonomies, Legal text mining, Legal Web 2.0, Web 2.0 and law
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »