Posts Tagged ‘Legal thesauri’
February 9, 2013
A call for papers — with abstract submission deadline of 28 February 2013 and full paper submission deadline of 15 May 2013 — has been issued for AICOL 2013: Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, to be held at a date to be determined, between 21 and 27 July 2013, in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
The workshop is being collocated with XXVI. World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
Papers for AICOL 2013 are invited on the following topics:
- Law and Science
- Knowledge Management
- Law and Cognitive Science
- Cognitive schemas
- Law and Complexity Theory
- Law and Robotics
- Complex Systems
- Law and Mathematics
- Legal Theory
- Legal Graphic Representation
- Legal Culture
- Game Theory
- Computer Ethics
- Formalization of Legal Systems and Norms
- Artificial Societies
- Rules and Standards
- Argumentative Frameworks
- Agreement technologies
- Legal Ontologies
- Electronic Institutions
- Governance
- Legal Concepts
- Legal Information Retrieval
- Legal Thesauri
- Online Dispute Resolution
- Taxonomies
- Trends in e-Discovery, e-Courts, e-Administration
- Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Legal Knowledge Acquisition
- Users’ studies
- Legal Knowledge Representation
For more details, please see the call.
HT Professor Dr. Monica Palmirani
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AICOL, AICOL 2013, Argumentation frameworks and law, Artificial intelligence and law, Artificial societies and legal information systems, Cognitive schemas and legal information systems, Cognitive science and legal information systems, Complex legal information systems, Complex systems and legal information, Complexity and law, Complexity theory and legal informatics, Complexity theory and legal information systems, Contract information systems, Court information systems, Digital courts, Digital institutions, Digital legal institutions, ecourts, ediscovery, Electronic courts, Electronic discovery, Electronic institutions, Electronic legal institutions, Formalization of legal norms, Formalization of legal rules, Formalization of legal systems, Game theory and legal information systems, Gamification of legal information systems, Graphic representation of legal information, Judicial information systems, Law and robotics, Law and robots, Legal agreement technologies, Legal argumentation frameworks, Legal cognitive schemas, Legal concepts, Legal evidence information systems, Legal graphic representation, Legal informatics conferences, Legal information behavior, Legal information retrieval, Legal information systems and complexity, Legal information user studies, Legal knowledge acquisition, Legal knowledge management, Legal knowledge representation, Legal natural language processing, Legal ontologies, Legal philosophy, Legal taxonomies, Legal theory, Legal thesauri, Modeling legal norms, Modeling legal rules, Modeling legal systems, Monica Palmirani, Natural language processing and law, Online court proceedings, Online dispute resolution, Online judicial proceedings, Robotics and law, Robots and law, Studies of legal information use, User studies, Virtual court proceedings, Virtual courts, Virtual judicial proceedings, Visualization of legal information, Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
May 24, 2012
An interview with Dr. Núria Casellas of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School (LII), entitled Legally Linked: Linked Open Data Principles Applied To Code Of Federal Regulations, has been published at semanticweb.com.
In this interview, Dr. Casellas discusses the application of Linked Data in Title 21 of LII’s new version of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. In that title, users can search for “brand names for drugs (such as Tylenol), and receiv[e] the generic name for the drug (acetaminophen) as a suggested term.” LII plans to incorporate “definitions, obligations and vocabularies, and product information to enhance search and retrieval, and also visualization of the information.”
Dr. Casellas also describes a plan to “link[] materials from the Drug Bank open data drug and drug target database, which has been transformed into RDF and made available as a SPARQL endpoint, to Title 21 in the CFR, and vice vers[a].” The article notes that LII “is developing a SKOS-based thesaur[us] derived from the terms used in the CFR, and extracting definitions and obligations.” LII also plans to include in its CFR metadata “product codes from sources such as the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).”
For more information, please see the complete article.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Administrative law information systems, CFR, Code of Federal Regulations, DrugBank, Legal Information Institute at Cornell University, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal semantic web, Legal thesauri, Linked Data and law, NAICS, Nuria Casellas, Product codes, Regulatory information systems, Semantic Web and law, semanticweb.com, SKOS, Tom Bruce
Posted in Applications, Interviews, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
December 21, 2011
Several legal informatics papers were presented at STOG 2011: Workshop on Semantic Technologies for Open Government, held 28 October 2011 in Florence, Italy, in conjunction with the e-Challenges 2011 conference:
Here is the workshop program:
- Marta Poblet, UAB Institute of Law and Technology, Spain: Mobile Phones, Images, Hashtags: Mobile Activism and Public Participation;
- Antoni Roig, IDT (Institute of Law And Technology), Spain: Towards a Global eDiscovery Standard;
- Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain: Dialogue and data. A relational model for governance and law;
- Jorge Gonzalez-Conejero, Institute of Law and Technology, Spain: Online Mediation Consumer Tools: MediWeb and MediApp;
- Meritxell Fernández-Barrera, Cersa, CNRS-Paris2, France: A contextualised ontology of the consumer law: bridging specialised and common-sense knowledge through contextual schemes;
- Monica Palmirani, University of Bologna, Italy: Beyond Information Toward Open Data;
- Enrico Francesconi, ITTIG-CNR, Italy: Thesaurus Mapping for Promoting Semantic Interoperability of European Public Services;
- Tommaso Agnoloni, CNR , Italy: Towards a European Legal Data Cloud.
For abstracts or full text of papers, please contact the authors.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Cloud computing and legal information, Consumer law information systems, Consumer law ontologies, Context and legal information systems, Context and legal ontologies, Contextual schemes and legal ontologies, e-Challenges, e-Challenges 2011, ediscovery, Electronic discovery, Enrico Francesconi, Legal evidence information systems, Legal knowledge representation, Legal ontologies, Legal open government data, Legal thesauri, Meritxell Fernández-Barrera, Monica Palmirani, ODR, Online dispute resolution, Semantic interoperability of legal information, Semantic Technologies for Open Government, STOG, STOG 2011, Workshop on Semantic Technologies for Open Government
Posted in Articles and papers, Conference papers, Conference proceedings | Leave a Comment »
December 20, 2011
[NOTE: This post has been updated to reflect the extended deadline of 19 February 2012. HT Simonetta Montemagni.]
A call for papers — with extended submission deadline of 19 February 2012 — has been issued for SPLeT 2012: Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Texts, to be held 27 May 2012 in Istanbul, Turkey.
SPLeT 2012 is being held in conjunction with LREC 2012: The Language Resources and Evaluation Conference.
Papers for SPLeT 2012 are invited on the following topics:
- Construction, extension, merging, customization of legal language resources, e.g. terminologies, ontologies
- Information retrieval and extraction from legal texts
- Semantic annotation of legal textual corpora
- Legal text processing
- Machine learning of legal texts
- Multilingual aspects of legal text semantic processing
- Legal thesauri mapping
- Automatic Classification of legal documents
- Logical analysis of legal language
- Automated parsing and translation of natural language arguments into a logical formalism
- Linguistically-oriented XML mark up of legal arguments
- Dialogue protocols for argumentation
- Legal argument ontology
- Computational theories of argumentation that are suitable to natural language
- Controlled language systems for law
For more information, please see the call for papers.
HT Dr. Adam Wyner.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Adam Wyner, Automatic classification of legal documents, Cross-language legal information retrieval, Cross-language legal text processing, Cross-language legal text semantic processing, Developing legal information resources, Developing legal information systems, International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Legal argument, Legal argumentation, Legal controlled vocabularies, Legal deontic logic, Legal dialogue protocols, Legal informatics conferences, Legal information retrieval, Legal knowledge representation, Legal logic, Legal natural language processing, Legal nonmonotonic reasoning, Legal ontologies, Legal reasoning, Legal text mining, Legal text processing, Legal thesauri, Legal XML, LREC, LREC 2012, Modeling legal logic, Multilingual aspects of legal text semantic processing, Multilingual legal information extraction, Multilingual legal information retrieval, Multilingual legal knowledge representation, Multilingual legal ontologies, Multilingual legal text processing, Natural language processing and law, Natural language processing of legal documents, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Semantic processing of legal texts, Semantic processing of multilingual legal texts, Simonetta Montemagni, SPLeT, SPLeT 2012, Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Texts
Posted in Conference Announcements, Calls for papers | Leave a Comment »
February 26, 2011
Calls for papers, with diverse submission deadlines, have been issued for the workshops at ICAIL 2011: The International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law; the workshops are scheduled to be held 6 and 10 June 2011, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
DESI IV: Workshop on Setting Standards for Searching Electronically Stored Information in Discovery Proceedings, 6 June 2011. Deadlines:
- 1 April 2011: Research papers;
- 22 April 2011: Position papers.
Workshop on Agent Model-Based Reasoning in Law, 6 June 2011. Deadline:
Computational Law: A Bridge Towards the Business Rules, 6 June 2011. Deadline:
AI & Evidential Inference, 10 June 2011. Deadline:
AHLTL 2011: Applying Human Language Technology to the Law, 10 June 2011. Deadline:
Coherence 2011: Artificial Intelligence, Coherence, and Judicial Reasoning, 10 June 2011. Deadlines:
- 15 April 2011: Abstracts;
- 3 June 2011: Full papers.
HT JURIX.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Alias detection and legal information, Argumentation scheme in judicial reasoning, Authority control and law, Automatic classification of legal documents, Cognitive psychology and law, Cognitive science and law, Coherence in judicial reasoning, Coherence in legal reasoning, Controlled language systems for law, Cross-language legal information systems, ecommerce, econtracting, econtracting systems, ediscovery, Electronic commerce systems, Electronic contracts, Electronic discovery, Evidential inference, ICAIL, ICAIL 2011, ICAIL ICAIL 2011, ICAIL workshops, Inference in legal evidence information systems, Information extraction, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Legal agent based systems, Legal argument, Legal argumentation, Legal case based reasoning, Legal communication systems, Legal conceptual schemes, Legal controlled language systems, Legal dialogue protocols, Legal dialogue systems, Legal discussion systems, Legal evidence information systems, Legal evidentiary argumentation, Legal evidentiary reasoning, Legal inference, Legal informatics conferences, Legal information extraction, Legal information retrieval, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal multilingual information retrieval, Legal narrative, Legal natural language processing, Legal ontologies, Legal rhetoric, Legal text mining, Legal thesauri, Legal translation, Legal translation system, Legal XML, Modeling business rules, Modeling judicial reasoning, Modeling legal agent interactions, Modeling legal evidentiary reasoning, Modeling legal reasoning, Modeling regulations, Multilingual legal information systems, Name authority control and law, Name matching and legal information, Natural language processing and law, Psychology and law, Semantic annotation of legal documents, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Semantic processing of legal texts, Statistical methods in legal evidentiary reasoning, Statistical methods in legal reasoning, Values in judicial argumentation, Values in judicial reasoning, Values in legal argumentation, Values in legal evidentiary reasoning, Values in legal reasoning
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | 2 Comments »
February 11, 2011
Approaches to Legal Ontologies: Theories, Domains, Methodologies (Springer 2011), a collection of scholarly articles on legal ontologies, has been published.
The volume is edited by Professor Dr. Giovanni Sartor of Università di Bologna CIRSFID, Professor Dr. Pompeu Casanovas of the Institute of Law & Technology (IDT) at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Maria Angela Biasiotti of ITTIG/CNR, and Meritxell Fernández-Barrera of the European University Institute Department of Law.
This is the first volume in Springer’s new Law, Governance, and Technology Series, edited by Professors Casanovas and Sartor.
Some of the articles in this volume are based on papers originally presented at the Workshop on Approaches to Legal Ontologies, held 9-10 December 2008, at European University Institute Department of Law, in Fiesole, Florence, Italy.
Here are the contents:
- Introduction: Theory and Methodology in Legal Ontology Engineering: Experiences and Future Directions / Pompeu Casanovas, Giovanni Sartor, Maria Angela Biasiotti, and Meritxell Fernández-Barrera
- The Legal Theory Perspective: Doctrinal Conceptual Systems vs. Computational Ontologies / Meritxell Fernández-Barrera and Giovanni Sartor
- Empirically Grounded Developments of Legal Ontologies: A Socio-Legal Perspective / Pompeu Casanovas, Núria Casellas, and Joan-Josep Vallbé
- A Cognitive Science Perspective on Legal Ontologies / Joost Breuker and Rinke Hoekstra
- Social Ontology and Documentality / Maurizio Ferraris
- The Case-Based Reasoning Approach: Ontologies for Analogical Legal Argument / Kevin D. Ashley
- A Complex-System Approach: Legal Knowledge, Ontology, Information and Networks / Pierre Mazzega, Danièle Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Nadia Nadah, and Romain Boulet
- The Multi-Layered Legal Information Perspective / Guido Boella and PierCarlo Rossi
- Legal Ontologies: The Linguistic Perspective / Maria Angela Biasiotti and Daniela Tiscornia
- A Legal Document Ontology: The Missing Layer in Legal Document Modelling / Monica Palmirani, Luca Cervone, and Fabio Vitali
- From Thesaurus Towards Ontologies in Large Legal Databases / Ángel Sancho Ferrer, Carlos Fernández Hernández, and José Manuel Mateo Rivero
- The Computational Ontology Perspective: Design Patterns for Web Ontologies / Aldo Gangemi, Valentina Presutti, and Eva Blomqvist
- A Learning Approach for Knowledge Acquisition in the Legal Domain / Enrico Francesconi
- Towards an Ontological Foundation for Services Science: The Legal Perspective / Roberta Ferrario, Nicola Guarino, and Meritxell Fernández-Barrera
- Legal Multimedia Ontologies and Semantic Annotation
for Search and Retrieval / Jorge González-Conejero
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Approaches to Legal Ontologies Theories Domains Methodologies, Complex systems and law, Computational legal ontologies, Computational linguistics and law, Computational ontologies, egovernment, Giovanni Sartor, Legal case based reasoning, Legal computational ontologies, Legal Document Ontology, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge acquisition, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multimedia ontologies, Legal ontologies, Legal thesauri, Linguistics and law, Linguistics and legal ontologies, Maria Angela Biasiotti, Meritxell Fernández-Barrera, Modeling legal documents, Modeling legal services, Modeling legal texts, Pompeu Casanovas, Semantic annotation of legal documents, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Workshop on Approaches to Legal Ontologies
Posted in Articles and papers, Conference papers, Conference proceedings, Monographs | Leave a Comment »
February 11, 2011
A call for papers — with submission deadline of 31 March 2011 — has been issued for AHLTL 2011: Applying Human Language Technology to the Law, a workshop to be held 10 June 2011, at ICAIL 2011: The Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
[If the call for papers or the workshop Website is down, click here for the cached version.]
Papers are invited on the following topics:
The workshop will focus on extraction of information from legal text, representations of legal language (ontologies and semantic translations), and dialogic aspects. While information extraction and retrieval are crucial areas, the workshop emphasises syntactic, semantic, and dialogic aspects of legal information processing.
Building legal resources: terminologies, ontologies, corpora.
Ontologies of legal texts, including subareas such as ontology acquisition, ontology customisation, ontology merging, ontology extension, ontology evolution, lexical information, etc.
Information retrieval and extraction from legal texts.
Semantic annotation of legal texts.
Multilingual aspects of legal text semantic processing.
Legal thesauri mapping.
Automatic Classification of legal documents.
Automated parsing and translation of natural language arguments into a logical formalism.
Linguistically-oriented XML mark up of legal arguments.
Computational theories of argumentation that are suitable to natural language.
Controlled language systems for law.
Name matching and alias detection.
Dialogue protocols and systems for legal discussion.
For more information, please see the call for papers.
HT Dr. Adam Wyner.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Adam Wyner, Alias detection and legal information, Authority control and law, Automatic classification of legal documents, Controlled language systems for law, Cross-language legal information systems, ICAIL ICAIL 2011, Information extraction, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Legal argument, Legal argumentation, Legal communication systems, Legal controlled language systems, Legal dialogue protocols, Legal dialogue systems, Legal discussion systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal information extraction, Legal information retrieval, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multilingual information retrieval, Legal natural language processing, Legal ontologies, Legal text mining, Legal thesauri, Legal translation, Legal translation system, Legal XML, Multilingual legal information systems, Name authority control and law, Name matching and legal information, Natural language processing and law, Semantic annotation of legal documents, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Semantic processing of legal texts
Posted in Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | 2 Comments »
January 16, 2011
Tags:Automatic classification of legal documents, Automatic updating of legal documents, Burden of proof, Conflict of laws information systems, Factors in legal case based reasoning, Inference in legal evidence information systems, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interoperability of legal thesauri, JURIX, JURIX 2010, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal burden of proof, Legal case based reasoning, Legal case frames, Legal citation standards, Legal citation systems, Legal citations, Legal deliberation, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal rhetoric, Legal taxonomies, Legal thesauri, LKIF Rule, Modeling burdens of proof, Modeling conflicts of law rules, Modeling legal citations, Modeling legal rules, Online legal deliberation, Semantic analysis of legal documents, Semantic analysis of legal texts, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science
Posted in Applications, Conference papers, Conference proceedings, Slides, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
December 15, 2010
Tags:Automatic classification of legal documents, Automatic updating of legal documents, Burden of proof, Conflict of laws information systems, Factors in legal case based reasoning, Inference in legal evidence information systems, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interoperability of legal thesauri, JURIX, JURIX 2010, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal burden of proof, Legal case based reasoning, Legal case frames, Legal citation standards, Legal citation systems, Legal citations, Legal deliberation, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal rhetoric, Legal taxonomies, Legal thesauri, LKIF Rule, Modeling burdens of proof, Modeling conflicts of law rules, Modeling legal citations, Modeling legal rules, Online legal deliberation, Semantic analysis of legal documents, Semantic analysis of legal texts, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science
Posted in Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
October 9, 2010
Tags:Automatic classification of legal documents, Automatic updating of legal documents, Burden of proof, Conflict of laws information systems, Factors in legal case based reasoning, Inference in legal evidence information systems, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interoperability of legal thesauri, JURIX, JURIX 2010, Legal agent based systems, Legal argumentation, Legal burden of proof, Legal case based reasoning, Legal case frames, Legal citation standards, Legal citation systems, Legal citations, Legal deliberation, Legal evidence information systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge representation, Legal multiagent systems, Legal rhetoric, Legal taxonomies, Legal thesauri, LKIF Rule, Modeling burdens of proof, Modeling conflicts of law rules, Modeling legal citations, Modeling legal rules, Online legal deliberation, Semantic analysis of legal documents, Semantic analysis of legal texts, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science
Posted in Articles and papers, Conference papers | Leave a Comment »