Posts Tagged ‘Legislative data’
May 4, 2013
Waldo Jaquith today launched Open Virginia, an open data platform for the U.S. state of Virginia.
Open Virginia is built with the CKAN open source data portal software.
Here is a description of Open Virginia:
Open Virginia is an effort to document the open government data published about the Commonwealth of Virginia—APIs, bulk downloads, and links to third-party data sources that provide much-needed information about how our government works.
Open Virginia currently offers access to legal data, including:
HT @shevski
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:CKAN, CKAN and legal data, CKAN and legislative data, Code sections affected by bills, Court decisions, Court metadata, Data about legislators, Free access to law, Judicial decisions, Judicial metadata, Legal descriptive metadata, Legal metadata, Legislative amendments, Legislative code sections affected by bills, Legislative data, Legislative information systems, Legislative metadata, Metadata about legislative amendments, Open legislative data, Open Virginia, Public access to legal information, Public access to legislative data, Waldo Jaquith
Posted in Applications, Data sets | Leave a Comment »
April 22, 2013
The Colorado statutory code and the Baltimore, Maryland statutory code have been posted free on the Web by Public.Resource.Org.
Public.Resource.Org appears to be communicating with entities that assert copyright in those codes, about whether those entities will take legal action to prevent posting of those codes on the free Web and the use of those codes by developers to create new information resources.
HT @carlmalamud here and here
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Free access to law, Public access to legal information, Open legal data, Carl Malamud, Public.Resource.Org, Statutory codes, Legislative data, Open legislative data, Colorado Revised Statutes, Baltimore City Code
Posted in Data sets | Leave a Comment »
March 22, 2013
Colin Lachance of the Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII) tells us that CanLII, which provides free access to Canadian law, has opened an application programming interface (API).
A description appears below.
Colin has a new post at Slaw.ca that provides context for the API launch: Unbundling legal information.
Description of CanLII API:
This document describes the specifications of the CanLII API. The API provides over a million court judgments, tens of thousands of statutes and regulations and covers all the major courts and legislatures, as well as over 150 specialized courts and tribunals.
How it works
Let’s dig into the more technical information:
- The technical guidelines provide details about encoding, formats, error management and content negotiation.
- The technical guideline will give you detailed information on how to develop your client and interact with the API.
Supported Resources:
Currently, the API supports following services:
Legislation browse: Regulations and statutes from all Canadian federal, provincial and territorial jurisdictions,
Case browse: Judgments from all courts and tribunals accessible on CanLII.
On top of the complete documentation, you can also access directly to the content of the API thanks to the I/O Docs module. [...]
For the API key and for other details, please see the description.
HT @sglassmeyer
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:APIs and legal data, APIs and legal information, APIs for court data, APIs for judicial data, APIs for legislative data, APIs for regulatory data, Application programming interfaces, Canadian Legal Information Institute, CANLII, CanLII API, Colin Lachance, Court decisions, Judicial APIs, Judicial application programming interfaces, Judicial decisions, Legal APIs, Legal application programming interfaces, Legal open government data, Legislative APIs, Legislative application programming interfaces, Legislative data, Open judicial data, Open legislative data, Open regulatory data, Slaw.ca
Posted in Applications, Data sets, Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
March 18, 2013
Akoma Ntoso’s Website has posted Akoma Ntoso adopted by the Italian Senate.
Here is an excerpt:
Starting from 23 February 2013, all the bills published on the Italian Senate website are available, other than in the usual HTML, PDF, and ePub formats, also in XML, using an Akoma Ntoso compliant scheme.
The Italian Senate, in the wake of the European Parliament, has also joined the growing number of parliaments supporting Akoma Ntoso as common to support more effective management of information and long-term preservation of formal documentation.
Akoma Ntoso is the result of the efforts of the Africa i-Parliaments Action Plan to realize a common standard for the interchange of legal documents among institutions and countries. Building on the opportunities offered by open standards, it aims at supporting the development of high-value parliamentary and legislative information services. [...]
In addition, the Italian Senate has made available a SPARQL endpoint for legislative Linked Data.
HT @cottinstef and @adreagui
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AKOMA NTOSO, Italian Senate, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal metadata, Legal metadata standards, Legal open government data, Legal semantic web, Legal structural metadata, Legal XML, Legislative data, Legislative information systems, Linked Data and law, Open legislative data, Semantic Web and law, Senate of Italy, SPARQL, SPARQL and law, SPARQL and legal information retrieval, SPARQL and legislative data
Posted in Applications, Standards, Technology developments | Leave a Comment »
March 16, 2013
Sarah Glassmeyer, JD, MLS, of CALI, has posted a spreadsheet that integrates the Open States Open Legislative Data Report Card ratings with the National Inventory of Legal Materials (NILM).
The NILM, compiled by the American Association of Law Libraries, lists data about each U.S. state’s online legal materials regarding copyright assertion, authentication, preservation, official status, permanent public access, uniform citation, and enactment of the Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act.
For more information on the NILM, please see:
HT @sglassmeyer
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:American Association of Law Libraries, Emily Feltren, Free access to law, Free access to legislative data, Legal open government data, Legislative data, National Inventory of Legal Materials, National Inventory of Primary Legal Materials, NILM, Open legislative data, Open Legislative Data Report Card, Open States, OpenStates, OpenStates Open Legislative Data Report Card, Public access to legal information, Public access to legislative data, Public access to legislative information, Sarah Glassmeyer, Tina Ching, Tina S. Ching
Posted in Data sets, Resources | Leave a Comment »
February 24, 2013
Jim Harper, Esq., of the Cato Institute tells us of this interesting event:
Wikipedia and Legislative Data Workshop, 14-15 March, Washington, DC.
Description:
Interested in the bills making their way through Congress?
Think they should be covered well in Wikipedia?
Well, let’s do something about it!
On Thursday and Friday, March 14th and 15th, we are hosting a conference here at the Cato Institute to explore ways of using legislative data to enhance Wikipedia.
Our project to produce enhanced XML markup of federal legislation is well under way [see examples of the XML markup at DeepBills (here and here)], and we hope to use this data to make more information available to the public about how bills affect existing law, federal agencies, and spending, for example.
What better way to spread knowledge about federal public policy than by supporting the growth of Wikipedia content?
Thursday’s session is for all comers. Starting at 2:30 p.m., we will familiarize ourselves with Wikipedia editing and policy, and at 5:30 p.m. we’ll have a Sunshine Week reception. (You don’t need to attend in the afternoon to come to the reception. Register now!)
On Friday, we’ll convene experts in government transparency, in Wikipedia editorial processes and decisions, and in MediaWiki technology to think things through and plot a course.
Do you have relevant interests and experience? Please apply! Applications for participation in the Friday session are due Friday, March 1. [...]
For more information or to register, please see the announcement.
HT @Jim_Harper
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Adding legal information to Wikipedia, Adding legislative data to Wikipedia, DeepBills, Jim Harper, Legal government data, Legal metadata, Legal structural metata, Legal XML, Legislative data, Legislative XML, Open legal government data, Public access to legal information, Public legal education, Reuse of legal open government data, Reuse of legislative data, Reuse of open legislative data, Wikipedia and law, Wikipedia and public legal education
Posted in Workshop | Leave a Comment »
February 23, 2013
Daniel Schuman, Esq., of the Sunlight Foundation, has posted GPO is Closing Gap on Public Access to Law at JCP’s Direction, But Much Work Remains, on the Sunlight Foundation Blog.
The post describes the U.S. Government Printing Office’s making available United States Statutes at Large, 1951-2009, with full text for individual statutes in PDF and .txt formats, and for entire volumes in PDF format, and metadata for individual statutes and in bulk for each volume in MODS format.
For example, click here for bulk metadata for volume 123 of U.S. Statutes at Large, in MODS format.
Here are excerpts from the post:
The GPO’s recent electronic publication of all legislation enacted by Congress from 1951-2009 is noteworthy for several reasons. It makes available nearly 40 years of lawmaking that wasn’t previously available online from any official source, narrowing part of a much larger information gap. It meets one of three long-standing directives from Congress’s Joint Committee on Printing regarding public access to important legislative information. And it has published the information in a way that provides a platform for third-party providers to cleverly make use of the information. While more work is still needed to make important legislative information available to the public, this online release is a useful step in the right direction. [...]
In mid-January 2013, GPO published approximately 32,000 individual documents, along with descriptive metadata, including all bills enacted into law, joint concurrent resolutions that passed both chambers of Congress, and presidential proclamations from 1951-2009. The documents have traditionally been published in print in volumes known as the “Statutes at Large,” which commonly contain all the materials issued during a calendar year. [...]‘
The online release of the Statutes at Large from 1951 forward, accompanied by good quality metadata, has made it possible for the public to see important (and not so important) legislation. [...] Of course, the major New Deal legislation, such as the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and anything from the last quarter of the 19th century, is still unavailable from GPO. And GPO/LOC still hasn’t incorporated the information it has released onto THOMAS. However, the free legislative information portal GovTrack already jumped in with both feet, incorporating this information on its website where users can easily search and find historical bills going back to 1951.
Depending on the quality of the searchable PDFs GPO has posted, it may also be just a matter of time before someone pull out the text from the PDFs and puts it into a database, too. That would improve the ability to search for bills and facilitate analysis of congressional activities. It also moves us one step closer to a very difficult but important goal: allowing people to see in real time how draft legislation would amend the law. For that to be possible, GPO would need to publish the Statutes at Large from prior to 1951 online in electronic form, including making clear the underlying structure of the statutes, plus there’d have to be some pretty significant advances in the tools available to parse legislative language. [...]
For more details, please see the complete post.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Bulk access to legal metadata, Bulk access to legislative data, Bulk access to legislative metadata, Bulk access to metadata of U.S. Statutes at Large, Daniel Schuman, Free access to law, GPO, Legal descriptive metadata, Legal metadata, Legislative data, MODS, Open legislative data, Public access to legal information, Slip laws, Sunlight Foundation Blog, U.S. GPO, U.S. Statutes at Large, United States Statutes at Large
Posted in Data sets | Leave a Comment »
February 22, 2013
The program for Open Data Day DC 2013, also called Open Data Day 2013 Hackathon – DC Metro — to be held 23 February 2013 in Washington, DC, USA — includes at least four legal informatics projects:
The Twitter hashtags for the event appear to be #opendataday #dc
Updates about the Open Data Day DC 2013 activities are available on the event’s hackpad.
If you know of other legal informatics projects to be discussed at Open Data Day DC 2013, please mention them in the comments.
Information about other legal hacking events appears here and here.
HT @JoshData
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:#dc, #LegalHack, #opendataday, Contract information systems, Court information systems, Eric Mill, Free access to law, Joshua Tauberer, Judicial information systems, Legal hackathons, Legal hacking, Legal hacking events, Legal hacking is a movement, Legal informatics hackathons, Legal open government data, Legislative data, Legislative information systems, Open Data Day DC, Open Data Day DC 2013, Open Data Day Hackathon DC Metro, Open Data Day Hackathon DC Metro 2013, Open legislative data, Open zoning data, Open zoning data standards, PACER, Public access to court documents, Public access to judicial documents, Public access to legal information, Real property information systems, RECAP, Zoning law information systems
Posted in Hackathons | 2 Comments »
February 15, 2013
The Open States law-related data project now covers all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, according to a new post at Sunlight Foundation Blog.
Here is an updated description of Open States:
Open States is a collection of tools that make it possible for citizens to track what is happening in their state’s capitol by aggregating information from all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico.
Using the site is simple: enter a U.S. address or select a state to start to research bills, [track bills,] review voting records, contact elected officials and more. [...]
Open States data are available via API and via bulk download.
There is a python client for the API.
Legal informatics projects that use Open States data include David Moore‘s OpenGovernment.org and Waldo Jaquith‘s The State Decoded.
HT @openstates
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:APIs, Application programming interfaces, James Turk, Legal APIs, Legal application programming interfaces, Legislative APIs, Legislative application programming interfaces, Legislative data, Legislative information systems, Open States, Open States Project, OpenStates, State legislative data, State legislative information systems, Sunlight Foundation, Thom Neale
Posted in APIs, Applications, Data sets | Leave a Comment »
February 2, 2013
Tags:#freeTHOMAS, Advisory Committee on Transparency, Congressional Research Service reports, Free access to law, Free access to legislative data, Free access to legislative information, Free PACER, freePACER, GovTrack, Harlan Yu, Jeremy Miller, Joshua Tauberer, Kick-starting the 113th Congress, Legislative data, Making Law Easier to Understand, Office of Legal Counsel, OLC memoranda, Open PACER, openPACER, PACER, Public access to court decisions, Public access to court information, Public access to court records, Public access to judicial decisions, Public access to judicial information, Public access to judicial records, Public access to legal information, Public access to legislation, Public access to legislative data, Public access to legislative information, RECAP, Stephen Schultze, Steve Schultze, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel
Posted in Applications, Conference proceedings, Presentations, Videos | Leave a Comment »