Posts Tagged ‘LKIF’
November 22, 2012
A call for papers — with submission deadline of 26 November 2012 — has been issued for the Jurix 2012 workshop entitled Legal Resources from Text to Rules, to be held 20 December 2012 in Amsterdam.
The workshop is being held in conjunction with JURIX 2012: International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, being held 17-20 December 2012 at Leibniz Center for Law, University of Amsterdam.
Here are details of the workshop:
The time is ripe for investigating the connections between the representation of legal XML texts and their formalization as legal rules.
For years these two communities have pursued their goals separately, but now emerging XML-based standards oriented both to legal documents (Akoma Ntoso, CEN Metalex, national XML standards, etc.) and to legal rules (LKIF, RuleML, RIF, SWRL, LegalRuleML, etc.) justify the possibility to combine techniques and foster their concrete application in the society (compliance, eGov services, legislative drafting, policy making applications, digital legal libraries, etc.).
This workshop aims to examine the relationship between legal computable ontologies as bridges from legal concepts and their legal texts and legal rules (predicates). Hybrid platform where ontologies are used to support legal reasoning and to create bidirectional dialogues with legal knowledge bases are part within the workshop scope.
Questions we will try to address:
- Are the statuses of legal XML standards fixed? What are the next steps?
- Are legal rules autonomous or they need to link their evidences to the text for support?
- Are multiple interpretations of a legal text possible without affecting its representations as legal XML documents?
- What are the roles of the legal ontologies and of semantic web (especially Linked Data) technologies in this scenario?
Proponents: Monica Palmirani, Fabio Vitali, Enrico Francesconi, Tom van Engers, Radboud Winkels
Selected papers will be published in the AICOL IV volume by the end of 2013, after a double peer-review process.
For more information, please see the call for papers.
HT Professor Palmirani
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:AKOMA NTOSO, CEN Metalex, Enrico Francesconi, International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Interpretation of legal language, Interpretation of legal texts, JURIX, JURIX 2012, Legal knowledge representation, Legal Linked Data, Legal metadata, Legal metadata standards, Legal ontologies, Legal Resources From Text to Rules, Legal semantic web, Legal structural metadata, Legal text interpretation, Legal text representation, Legal XML, LegalRuleML, Linked Data and law, LKIF, Modeling legal rules, Monica Palmirani, Radboud Winkels, Representation of legal rules, Representation of legal texts, RIF, RuleML, Semantic Web and law, SWRL
Posted in Applications, Calls for papers, Conference Announcements, Standards | Leave a Comment »
May 19, 2010
Tags:Antonino Rotolo, Guido Governatori, International RuleML Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications, International Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications, Legal Knowledge Interchange Format, Legal knowledge representation, Legal metadata interchange standards, Legal rule interchange formats, Legal semantic web, LKIF, Modeling legal rules, RIF, Rule Interchange Format, Rule markup language, RuleML, RuleML 2009, SBVR, Semantic Web and law, Semantic Web Rule Language, Semantics Of Business Vocabulary and Rules, SWRL, Thomas F Gordon
Posted in Articles and papers, Conference papers | Leave a Comment »
May 10, 2010
Tags:Legal informatics conferences, Legal Knowledge Interchange Format, Legal knowledge representation, Legal ontologies, Legal semantic web, Legal thesauri, LIT, LIT 2010, LKIF, Semantic Web and law, Sources of law, Traceability of sources of law, Workshop on Legal Informatics and Legal Information Technology
Posted in Articles and papers, Conference papers, Conference proceedings | Leave a Comment »
March 23, 2010
The following new legal informatics conference proceedings have been published: Law and Technology: Looking into the Future. Selected Essays (Meritxell Fernández-Barrera, Norberto Nuno Gomes de Andrade, Primavera de Filippi, Mario Viola de Azevedo Cunha, Giovanni Sartor, Pompeu Casanovas eds., 2010), ISBN: 9788883980602, 370 Pages. This volume contains papers originally presented at The Future of … Conference on Law and Technology, held 28-29 October 2008 at the European University Institute’s ONE-LEX Project.
Here is the abstract:
Perspective analysis are particularly important in the ICT-law domain, since ICTs have known the most accelerated development in the last decades, and the deepest social effects (determined the passage from the industrial society to the social formation labelled by us information, knowledge or network society), matched by pervasive legal change (from data protection, to intellectual property, to internet law). As ICT development and the ICT driven social evolution are still accelerating their steps, it is necessary that the law does not remain confined to current problems and established outcomes: it needs to look into the future scenarios for capturing the sense of dynamics now underway and for preparing adequate legal response.
Here are the legal informatics papers included in the volume, with links to full-text or abstracts where available:
For more information, including the complete table of contents, please see the book description.
HT Professor Enrico Francesconi.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Legal ontologies, Legal knowledge representation, Legal informatics conferences, Online dispute resolution, Legal information retrieval, Legal informatics monographs, Alternative dispute resolution systems, Online dispute resolution systems, Legal citations, LKIF, Legal Knowledge Interchange Format, Legal negotiation systems, EUI, Giovanni Sartor, Law and Technology: Looking into the Future. Selected Essays, Legal citation analysis, Modeling legislation, Modeling legal rules, Legal risk management systems, Relational law, Legal dispute resolution systems, Pompeu Casanovas, Anton Geist, Giuseppe Contissa, Tobias Mahler, Future of Conference on Law and Technology, European University Institute, ONE-LEX
Posted in Conference papers, Conference proceedings, Monographs, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
February 3, 2010
An overview of The ESTRELLA Project (The European project for Standardized Transparent Representations in order to Extend Legal Accessibility), a major legal informatics project based at the University of Amsterdam’s Leibniz Center for Law, and intended to create standards for European legal information systems, has been posted by Dr. Adam Wyner.
The post contains excerpts from the 2008 ESTRELLA User Report.
Dr. Wyner describes the main components of the project:
For more information, please see the entire post.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:ESTRELLA, European project for Standardized Transparent Representations in order to Extend Legal Accessibility, Inference rules for legal information, Legal argument, Legal argumentation, Legal case based reasoning, Legal Knowledge Interchange Format, Legal knowledge representation, Legal ontologies, Legal semantic web, Legal XML, Legislative XML, Leibniz Center for Law, LKIF, LKIF Core Ontology, MetaLex, Modeling legal argument, Modeling legal cases, Semantic Web and law, XML schemas for legislation
Posted in Applications, Project deliverables, Projects, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
November 10, 2009
Applications are invited for a position for a Ph.D. candidate to work on a research project in policy-related argument reconstruction and formalization, at The Leibniz Center for Law of the University of Amsterdam. The candidate must have “a background in computational linguistics, or artificial intelligence, with an interest in argumentation. Experience with semantic web technology and practical IT skills are an advantage. Candidates should be proficient in English.”
The position is in connection with IMPACT (Improving Access to Text), “an international project, partially funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework programme. [IMPACT] will conduct original research to develop and integrate formal, computational models of policy and arguments about policy, to facilitate deliberations about policy at a conceptual, language-independent level. To support the analysis of policy proposals in an inclusive way which respects the interests of all stakeholders, research on tools for reconstructing arguments from data resources distributed throughout the Internet will be conducted. The key problem is translation from these sources in natural language to formal argumentation structures, which will be input for automatic reasoning.
“The candidate will be working on the design of an argument reconstruction tool, which uses a library of argumentation schemes to support the manual reconstruction of arguments from natural language texts. Moreover, an extension of existing XML formats for weblogs, such as RSS or Atom, will be developed which would enable future weblogs to mark up the structure of arguments in articles in such a way as to enable the arguments to be automatically aggregated, analysed and visualized, without human intervention. The extension may be based on the argument elements of the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF) developed previously by the partners in the ESTRELLA project (IST-2004-027655). The research will result in several publications, including a PhD thesis.”
For more information, please see the position announcement.
HT Dr. Radboud Winkels.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Argument formalization, Argument reconstruction, Argument systems, Argumentation, Argumentation systems, ESTRELLA, Formalization of policy arguments, IMPACT, Improving Access to Text, Legal informatics dissertations, Legal informatics doctoral student positions, Legal informatics PhD candidate positions, Legal informatics PhD student positions, Legal informatics theses, Legal Knowledge Interchange Format, Leibniz Center for Law, LKIF, Policy argument formalization, Policy argument reconstruction, Policy argument systems, Policy argumentation, Policy knowledge representation, Radboud Winkels, Reconstruction of policy arguments, Tom van Engers, University of Amsterdam
Posted in PhD student positions | Leave a Comment »