Tag Archives: Modeling legal rules

Ramakrishna and Paschke: Semi-Automated Vocabulary Building for Structured Legal English

Shashishekar Ramakrishna and Adrian Paschke presented a paper entitled Semi-Automated Vocabulary Building for Structured Legal English, at RuleML 2014: International Web Rule Symposium, held 18-20 August 2014 in Prague. Here is the abstract of the paper: Structured English has been … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Smith et al.: Legal Responsibility for the Acts of Others: A Logical Analysis

Clara Smith, Erica Calardo, Antonino Rotolo, and Giovanni Sartor presented a paper entitled Legal Responsibility for the Acts of Others: A Logical Analysis, at RuleML 2014: International Web Rule Symposium, held 18-20 August 2014 in Prague. Here is the abstract … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ramakrishna and Paschke: A Process for Knowledge Transformation and Knowledge Representation of Patent Law

Shashishekar Ramakrishna and Adrian Paschke presented a paper entitled A Process for Knowledge Transformation and Knowledge Representation of Patent Law, at RuleML 2014: International Web Rule Symposium, held 18-20 August 2014 in Prague. Here is the abstract of the paper: … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Methodology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

JURIX 2014: Deadline extended to 12 September for call for papers submissions

The submission deadline has been extended to 12 September 2014 for JURIX 2014: International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, being held 10-12 December 2014, at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland. For later dates please see the list of … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Calls for papers, Conference Announcements, Research findings, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Stanford Computable Contracts Initiative

The Stanford Computable Contracts Initiative — a project of CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics — is apparently scheduled to launch soon, though the precise date has not been announced. The initiative is led by Harm Bavinck of Effacts. … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Projects, Standards, Technology developments, Technology tools, Videos | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Surden: Computable Contracts – Part 2

Professor Harry Surden of the University of Colorado has posted Computable Contracts – Part 2, at Concurring Opinions. Here is a summary of the post: This is the second part of a series explaining “computable contracts.” For more about what … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts, Technology developments, Technology tools, Videos | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment