Tag Archives: Statistical methods in legal informatics

Legal informatics papers at ICFIS 2014

A number of papers on legal informatics, legal data analysis, or legal information were presented at ICFIS 2014: International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics, held 19-22 August 2014 in Leiden. The program is available at: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6795661/ICFIS2014/program.html HT Bart Verheij

Posted in Applications, Conference resources, Methodology, Technology developments | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vlek et al.: Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: A case study evaluation

Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, and Bart Verheij, have published Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation, forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Here is the abstract: In a criminal trial, evidence is … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Case studies, Methodology, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dolin: Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random Walk

Ron Dolin of Stanford Law School has posted slides of his presentation entitled Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random Walk, given at the conference, Inconsistency Robustness 2014, held 29-31 July 2014 at Stanford University. The presentation describes several types … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Policy debates, Presentations, Slides, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Katz, Bommarito, and Blackman: Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito, and Josh Blackman have posted a working paper entitled Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach. Here is the abstract: Building upon developments in theoretical and applied machine … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings, Software | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Katz and Bommarito’s research on measuring legal complexity is featured in Wired Science

Daniel Martin Katz and Michael Bommarito‘s paper, entitled Measuring the Complexity of the Law: The United States Code, is the focus of a new post by Samuel Arbesman at Wired Science: Measuring the Complexity of the Law. Here are excerpts … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Data sets, Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts, Research findings, Software, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Schilling: Field of Forces: Strategic Interdependence in Legislative Behavior

Emily U. Schilling of the University of Iowa presented a paper entitled Field of Forces: Interdependence in Legislative Decision Making, 26 April 2014 at the New Faces in Political Methodology conference, sponsored by the Penn State Quantitative Social Science Initiative, … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Methodology, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ruhl and Katz: How Complex is the Law, and How Complex Should It Be?

Professor Dr. J. B. Ruhl of Vanderbilt University and Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz of Michigan State University and the ReInvent Law Laboratory, presented a paper entitled How Complex is the Law, and How Complex Should It Be?, at SEAL … Continue reading

Posted in Abstracts, Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Methodology, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment