Posts Tagged ‘Technology and legal ethics’
September 23, 2012
A call for presentation proposals — with submission deadline of 15 October 2012 — has been issued for ReInventLaw Dubai 2012: “an ‘un’conference devoted to law, technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship” — to be held 10 December 2012 at Media City in Dubai.
The organizers particularly welcome presentations about innovations in legal services or legal education. Presentations can take the form of 6 Minute Ignite Style Presentations or 12 Minute “TED Style” Presentations.
Registration is free.
The event Website describes the event as follows:
ReInvent Law Dubai is an “un”conference devoted to law, technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
Anyone interested in the future of law or technology or entrepreneurship will want to participate. Come hear about the innovative ideas generated by the highly-engaging atmosphere of the event!
The event is being sponsored by The ReInventLaw Laboratory at Michigan State University College of Law, and is modeled on the LawTechCamp London 2012 event held last summer.
For more information, please see the ReInventLaw Dubai 2012 Website.
HT @computational.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Legal instructional technology, Legal education reform, Law practice technology, Legal educational technology, Daniel Martin Katz, Legal ethics, Semantic processing of legal texts, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Statistical methods in legal informatics, Technology and legal ethics, Legal text processing, Technology and access to justice, Quantitative legal prediction, lawTechcamp, Innovation in legal technology, Cloud computing and legal information, LawTechCamp London, LawTechCamp London 2012, Renee Newman Knake, ReInvent Law, Innovation in legal services delivery, Innovations in law practice, Big data and legal technology, Dubai Knowledge Village, ReInvent Law Dubai, ReInvent Law Dubai 2012, ReInvent Law London 2012, ReInventLaw Laboratory
Posted in Conference Announcements, Calls for participation, Calls for proposals | 1 Comment »
July 28, 2012
Tags:#subtech2012, Applied legal instruction, Clinical legal education, Innovation in legal education, International Conference on Substantive Technology in Legal Education and Practice, Law practice innovation, Law practice technology, Law school technology, Legal decision support systems, Legal education reform, Legal expert systems, Legal instructional technology, Practicing law online, Quantitative legal prediction, SubTech, SubTech 2012, Technology and legal ethics, Technology in clinical legal education, Unbundled legal services, Unbundling of legal services, Virtual law practice
Posted in Conference reports, Conference resources | 1 Comment »
July 27, 2012
Tags:#subtech2012, Applied legal instruction, Clinical legal education, Innovation in legal education, International Conference on Substantive Technology in Legal Education and Practice, Law practice innovation, Law practice technology, Law school technology, Legal decision support systems, Legal education reform, Legal expert systems, Legal instructional technology, Practicing law online, Quantitative legal prediction, SubTech, SubTech 2012, Technology and legal ethics, Technology in clinical legal education, Unbundled legal services, Unbundling of legal services, Virtual law practice
Posted in Applications, Conference Announcements, Conference resources | Leave a Comment »
July 9, 2012
ReInvent Law Dubai 2012: Unconference on Law, Technology, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship will be held 10 December 2012 at Dubai Knowledge Village, Dubai, UAE, according to an announcement at Computational Legal Studies.
The event’s organizers will be Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz and Professor Renee Newman Knake, both of the Michigan State University College of Law and its new ReInvent Law Laboratory.
According to the event brochure:
ReInvent Law Dubai is an (un)conference focusing on law, technology, innovation and entrepreneurship. Building upon the success of the recent London event, leaders in the fields of law, technology and beyond will come together to share ideas about innovation in the delivery of legal services.
This event is Free, Open and Participatory. Anyone can propose a topic. Entrepreneurs, new media/technology enthusiasts, legal professionals, social networkers, and those curious about future innovation in law and technology will want to attend.
The Michigan State University College of Law Graduate Program at MSU Dubai is a primary sponsor.
For more information, please see the announcement.
HT @computational.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:Big data and legal technology, Cloud computing and legal information, Daniel Martin Katz, Dubai Knowledge Village, Innovation in legal services delivery, Innovation in legal technology, Innovations in law practice, Law practice technology, lawTechcamp, LawTechCamp London, LawTechCamp London 2012, Legal education reform, Legal educational technology, Legal ethics, Legal instructional technology, Legal text processing, Quantitative legal prediction, ReInvent Law, ReInvent Law Dubai, ReInvent Law Dubai 2012, ReInvent Law London 2012, Renee Newman Knake, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Semantic processing of legal texts, Statistical methods in legal informatics, Technology and access to justice, Technology and legal ethics
Posted in Conference Announcements | Leave a Comment »
June 28, 2012
LawTechCamp London 2012 — “a BarCamp-style community UnConference for new media and technology enthusiasts and legal professionals” — will be held 29 June 2012 in London, England, UK.
The Twitter hashtag for the conference is #lawtechcamplondon.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets — in .csv format — from the event.
Click here for the conference program.
A notable characteristic of this event is that it gathers together in one place individuals from most of the different subgroups of the legal informatics community.
The event’s organizers include:
HT @reneeknake.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:(John Sheridan, Big data and legal technology, Cloud computing and legal information, David Allen Green, Innovation in legal services delivery, Innovation in legal technology, Innovations in law practice, Jack Conrad, Law practice technology, lawTechcamp, LawTechCamp London, LawTechCamp London 2012, Legal education reform, Legal educational technology, Legal ethics, Legal instructional technology, Legal text processing, Quantitative legal prediction, Richard Susskind, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Semantic processing of legal texts, Statistical methods in legal informatics, Technology and access to justice, Technology and legal ethics
Posted in Conference Announcements | 1 Comment »
June 9, 2012
The program has been posted for LawTechCamp London 2012 — “a BarCamp-style community UnConference for new media and technology enthusiasts and legal professionals” — to be held 29 June 2012 in London, England, UK.
The Twitter hashtag for the conference is #lawtechcamplondon.
A notable characteristic of this event is that it gathers together in one place individuals from most of the different subgroups of the legal informatics community.
The event’s organizers include:
HT @reneeknake.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:(John Sheridan, Big data and legal technology, Cloud computing and legal information, David Allen Green, Innovation in legal services delivery, Innovation in legal technology, Innovations in law practice, Jack Conrad, Law practice technology, lawTechcamp, LawTechCamp London, LawTechCamp London 2012, Legal education reform, Legal educational technology, Legal ethics, Legal instructional technology, Legal text processing, Quantitative legal prediction, Richard Susskind, Semantic annotation of legal texts, Semantic processing of legal texts, Statistical methods in legal informatics, Technology and access to justice, Technology and legal ethics
Posted in Applications, Conference Announcements, Conference proceedings, Presentations, Technology developments, Technology tools | Leave a Comment »
February 11, 2010
Written testimony submitted to the American Bar Association (ABA) Commission on Ethics 20/20 at the commission’s first public hearing, held on 5 February 2010 at the Walt Disney World Dolphin Hotel near Orlando, Florida, USA, is now available.
Click here for public comments on the commission’s Preliminary Issues Outline.
Here are upcoming commission events:
- April 29-30, 2010: The commission plans to meet in Washington, DC;
- June 2-5, 2010: The commission’s agenda will be the focus of
the 2010 ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility, at the Westin Hotel, in Seattle, Washington, USA.
- June 4, 2010: A Roundtable Discussion on the commission’s work will be held at the 2010 ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility, at the Westin Hotel, in Seattle, Washington, USA.
- August 6, 2010: The commission will meet at the 2010 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, California, USA;
- August 6, 2010: A public hearing will be held at the 2010 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, California, USA;
- October 15, 2010: The commission will hold its fall meeting at the Hotel Sax, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- October 16, 2010: A public hearing will be held at the commission’s fall meeting at the Hotel Sax, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
For more information, please see the commission’s Website.
[NOTE: Updated 1 August 2010 to correct date of August 2010 public hearing.]
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20, ABA Ethics 20/20 Commission, American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20, American Bar Association Ethics 20/20 Commission, Cloud computing and law, Confidential information, Law practice technology, Legal communication, Legal ethics, Legal ethics information systems, Legal ethics reform, Legal social media, Legal social networks, Outsourcing of legal services, Privileged information, Technology and legal ethics, Web 2.0 and law
Posted in Policy Materials, Projects | Leave a Comment »
January 14, 2010
Tags:ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20, ABA Ethics 20/20 Commission, American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20, American Bar Association Ethics 20/20 Commission, Cloud computing and law, Confidential information, Law practice technology, Legal communication, Legal ethics, Legal ethics information systems, Legal ethics reform, Legal social media, Legal social networks, Outsourcing of legal services, Privileged information, Technology and legal ethics, Web 2.0 and law
Posted in Documents, Policy Materials | Leave a Comment »
January 8, 2010
Spaces are open, with application deadline of 11 January 2010, for persons wishing to testify at the first public hearing of the American Bar Association (ABA) Commission on Ethics 20/20, to be held on 5 February 2010 at the Walt Disney World Dolphin Hotel near Orlando, Florida, USA.
Individuals or organizations wishing to testify are invited to contact Kimley Grant at grantk@staff.abanet.org or 312/988-5319.
For more information about the commission’s work and agenda items, many of which concern legal technology, information, or communication, please see the commission’s Website or my earlier post.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20, ABA Ethics 20/20 Commission, American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20, American Bar Association Ethics 20/20 Commission, Cloud computing and law, Confidential information, Law practice technology, Legal communication, Legal ethics, Legal ethics information systems, Legal ethics reform, Legal social media, Legal social networks, Outsourcing of legal services, Privileged information, Technology and legal ethics, Web 2.0 and law
Posted in Policy Materials, Projects | Leave a Comment »
December 12, 2009
[NOTE: Updated on 14 January 2010 to link to the public comments received by the commission.]
Comments are invited (please scroll down), with submission deadline of 31 December 2009, on the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 Preliminary Issues Outline.
Click here to view the public comments received by the commission.
The Commission’s charge is to “perform a thorough review of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the U.S. system of lawyer regulation in the context of advances in technology and global legal practice developments. Our challenge is to study these issues and, with 20/20 vision, propose policy recommendations that will allow lawyers to better serve their clients, the courts and the public now and well into the future.”
Please email comments about the outline to: ethics2020@staff.abanet.org. Please send questions to Commission Counsel Ellyn S. Rosen at rosene@staff.abanet.org. Click here to join the Commission’s listserv.
Legal informatics researchers may be interested to note that the outline covers many of the key issues concerning the role of technology in legal practice.
Among the topics addressed in the outline are:
- Multijurisdictional practice;
- Outsourcing of legal services;
- Conflicts of interest;
- Confidential information: different rules applicable in different jurisdictions; the impact of privacy and data protection laws;
- Choice of law;
- Alternative business structures for law firms: nonlawyer owners or managers, multidisciplinary practices, publicly traded firms, etc.;
- Regulation of law firms as well as individual lawyers, and whether lawyer/law firm regulation should be more proactive;
- International arbitration;
- Issues related to technology:
- Whether current legal ethics rules inhibit technology-enabled multijurisdictional practice;
- Virtual law firms;
- Regulation of legal advice respecting law that is uniform throughout the U.S.;
- Lawyers’ use of social networking technology;
- Unbundling of legal services;
- Opensourcing of legal services;
- Online sharing of work product (i.e., “peer to peer”);
- Lawyer accountability, and transparency of information respecting lawyer regulation: providing free online access to information about public lawyer regulatory actions; lawyer rating services; access to information about regulatory actions related to non-U.S. lawyers;
- The rule of technology in access to justice;
- Technology and lawyer competence;
- Technology and inadvertent disclosure of privileged/confidential information: especially in connection with cloud computing;
- Technology and data retention;
- Protection of clients from effects of lawyers’ inappropriate use of technology, including social media;
- Technology and lawyers’ exposure to regulation by jurisdictions in which lawyers do not wish to practice.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Tags:ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20, ABA Ethics 20/20 Commission, American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20, American Bar Association Ethics 20/20 Commission, Cloud computing and law, Confidential information, Law practice technology, Legal communication, Legal ethics, Legal ethics information systems, Legal ethics reform, Legal social media, Legal social networks, Outsourcing of legal services, Privileged information, Technology and legal ethics, Web 2.0 and law
Posted in Professional activities, Projects | Leave a Comment »