Harlan Yu of the Princeton University Center for Information Technology Policy (CITP) has posted Assessing PACER’s Access Barriers, on the CITP blog Freedom to Tinker.
Mr. Yu’s post assesses the preliminary report of a study of PACER by the U.S. federal courts, and described in the new issue of Third Branch.
While that report indicates high user satisfaction with PACER, Mr. Yu cites evidence that the PACER user community is unnecessarily small, due to access obstacles such as fees and accepted payment methods.
Mr. Yu urges the federal courts to remove these barriers to access and to explore alternative means of administering and funding PACER, as Stephen Schultze recommended earlier this year.
This entry was posted in Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts
, Policy debates
, Policy Materials
and tagged CITP
, Free access to law
, Freedom to Tinker
, Harlan Yu
, J. Rich Leonard
, Public access to court records
, Public access to legal information
, Stephen Schultze
. Bookmark the permalink