Tag Archives: erulemaking

Farina et al.: Democratic Deliberation in the Wild: The McGill Online Design Studio and the RegulationRoom Project

Cynthia Farina, Hoi Kong, Cheryl Blake, Mary Newhart, and Nik Luka have published Democratic Deliberation in the Wild: The McGill Online Design Studio and the RegulationRoom Project, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 41, 1527-1580 (2014). The full text appears to be … Continue reading

Posted in Abstracts, Applications, Articles and papers, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Epstein et al.: The Value of Words: Narrative as Evidence in Policy Making

Dmitri Epstein, Cynthia R. Farina, and Josiah Heidt have published The Value of Words: Narrative as Evidence in Policy Making, Evidence and Policy, 10, 243-258 (2014). Here is the abstract: Policy makers today rely primarily on technical data as their … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Articles and papers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Epstein et al.: The “analog” aspects of online public engagement in e-rulemaking

Dmitry Epstein, Mary Newhart, and Rebecca Vernon have published Not by technology alone: The “analog” aspects of online public engagement in policymaking, forthcoming in Government Information Quarterly. Here is the abstract: Between Twitter revolutions and Facebook elections, there is a … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Case studies, Research findings, Technology developments, Technology tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Yavorosky: Predicting the effect of public comments on administrative rules

Bart Mykolas Yavorosky has posted the full text of his Ph.D. dissertation entitled Comparing Apples: Predicting the effect of public comments on administrative rules (Virginia Tech, 2014). Here is the abstract: This dissertation addresses three questions about administrative rulemaking: Do … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Dissertations and theses, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Call for papers: HICSS 2015 minitrack on e-Justice and e-Law

A call for papers has been posted for a mini-track on e-Justice and e-Law, at HICSS 48: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, being held 5-8 January 2015, in Kauai, Hawaii. The submission deadline is 15 June 2014. Here is … Continue reading

Posted in Applications, Calls for papers, Conference Announcements | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Krilenko et al.: Do U.S. Regulators Listen to the Public? Testing the Regulatory Process with the RegRank Algorithm

Professor Dr. Andrei A. Kirilenko of MIT, Professor Dr. Shawn Mankad of the University of Maryland, and Professor Dr. George Michailidis of the University of Michigan, have posted Do U.S. Regulators Listen to the Public?: Testing the Regulatory Process with … Continue reading

Posted in Articles and papers, Research findings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment