Pages
- ABOUT
- ACCESS-TO-JUSTICE MEASURES
- COPYRIGHT, LICENSE, & PERMISSIONS
- DISCLAIMER
- LEGAL COMMUNICATION TUMBLR
- LEGAL HACKATHONS AND OTHER LEGAL HACKING EVENTS
- LEGAL HACKING, TECHNOLOGY, AND INNOVATION GROUPS
- LEGAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORK
- LEGAL INFORMATICS TUMBLR
- LEGAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS & LEGAL INFORMATICS RESOURCES
- THE LEGAL HACKING MOVEMENT
Twitter Updates
- RT @tiffmgraves: I’m beyond thrilled and incredibly honored to be included on the list of “Women of Legal Tech 2018,” where I join a very a… 1 day ago
- RT @InnoJustice: Legal + Technology = #Access2Justice. But, is #legaltech equal to justice innovations? Designing startups around the need… 1 day ago
- RT @computational: We are very happy to partner with our friends at @reedsmithllp on this program. Congrats to @Artie_Thinks from @Chicago… 1 day ago
- RT @LawLaboratory: We're thrilled to have one of our students in the inaugural #LegalTech Summer Associate Program at @reedsmithllp! Congra… 1 day ago
- RT @MSULaw: Check it out! 2L Justin Evans Makes Waves with Newest Journal Article. law.msu.edu/news/2018/evan… https://t.co/VanlnVmcCr 1 day ago
-
Recent Posts
- Updates Now on Legal Informatics Tumblr and Twitter
- Greenwood: Law Itself is the Killer Blockchain App
- SubTech 2016: International Conference on Substantive Technology in Legal Education and Practice: Storify, links, and resources
- New Online Group for Those Who Teach Technology to Law Students
- LTDCA 2016: Workshop on Legal Text, Document, and Corpus Analytics: Proceedings, Report, and storify
- Vlek et al.: A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios
- Boella et al.: Eunomos, a legal document and knowledge management system for the Web
- Updated: Legal informatics conference calendar
- Global Legal Technology Laboratory Conference 2016: Links and resources
- Legal Technology Panels at SXSW 2016
- Pausing
- Land: Participatory Fact-Finding: Developing New Directions for Human Rights Investigations Through New Technologies
- Tech for Justice Hackathon+ Austin: Results, storify, links, and resources
- Tech for Justice Hackathon+ Austin: February 21-22, 2015
- Legal technology activities at Code Across, February 21-22, 2015, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Recent Comments
- #LegalHack
- Artificial intelligence and law
- Citizens' participation in lawmaking
- Court decisions
- Court information systems
- Criminal law information systems
- Daniel Martin Katz
- Digital legal publishing
- ediscovery
- egovernment
- Empirical methods in legal communication studies
- Empirical methods in legal informatics
- eparticipation
- eparticipation systems
- Free access to law
- Innovation in legal technology
- Judicial decisions
- Judicial information systems
- Law.gov
- Law practice technology
- Legal agent based systems
- Legal argument
- Legal argumentation
- Legal communication
- Legal crowdsourcing
- Legal decisionmaking
- Legal descriptive metadata
- Legal educational technology
- Legal evidence information systems
- Legal expert systems
- Legal hackathons
- Legal hacking events
- Legal informatics conferences
- Legal information behavior
- Legal information retrieval
- Legal instructional technology
- Legal knowledge representation
- Legal Linked Data
- Legal metadata
- Legal metadata standards
- Legal multiagent systems
- Legal natural language processing
- Legal ontologies
- Legal open government data
- Legal reasoning
- Legal rhetoric
- Legal semantic web
- Legal social media
- Legal social networks
- Legal structural metadata
- Legal technology innovation
- Legal text processing
- Legal Web 2.0
- Legal XML
- Legislative data
- Legislative information systems
- Legislative metadata
- Legislative XML
- Linked Data and law
- Modeling legal reasoning
- Modeling legal rules
- Natural language processing and law
- Online dispute resolution
- Open legal data
- Open legislative data
- Preservation of digital legal information
- Public access to legal information
- Regulatory information systems
- Semantic Web and law
- Statistical methods in legal informatics
- Technology for access to justice
- Tom Bruce
- Visualization of legal information
- VoxPopuLII
- Web 2.0 and law
Categories
- Abstracts (24)
- Accolades (9)
- Administrivia (11)
- Algorithms (2)
- APIs (34)
- Applications (1,218)
- Articles and papers (967)
- Audio (9)
- Authority Files (1)
- Award or prize announcements (13)
- Bibliographies (18)
- Blog administration (2)
- Blogposts (11)
- Blogs (5)
- Book reviews (3)
- Business developments (3)
- Calls for evidence (1)
- Calls for papers (210)
- Calls for participation (27)
- Calls for proposals (28)
- Case studies (23)
- Chapters (16)
- Clinics (1)
- Commentary (33)
- Committees (2)
- Competitions (12)
- Conference Announcements (415)
- Conference papers (316)
- Conference proceedings (138)
- Conference reports (23)
- Conference resources (146)
- Cooperation (1)
- Course materials (10)
- Courses and curricula (10)
- Court decisions (6)
- Curriculum materials (1)
- Data sets (135)
- Demonstrations (5)
- Demos (2)
- Design events (4)
- Discussion groups (4)
- Discussions (4)
- Dissertations and theses (23)
- Doctoral Workshops and Seminars (7)
- Documentation (1)
- Documents (10)
- Enactment of Laws (1)
- Encyclopedia articles (2)
- Ethics Opinions (2)
- Examples (4)
- Extended Events (1)
- Fellowships (12)
- Glossaries (1)
- Google+ hangouts (1)
- Grants (21)
- Groups (4)
- Guides (1)
- Hackathons (103)
- Hacking (88)
- Handouts (2)
- History (5)
- Ideas (1)
- Images (4)
- Interviews (11)
- Job announcements (6)
- Journals (2)
- Lectures (20)
- Legal defense funds (1)
- Lists of resources (29)
- Literature reviews (10)
- Manuals (1)
- Maps (1)
- Meetings (11)
- Meta-analyses (1)
- Methodology (35)
- Monographs (53)
- New journals (1)
- News (12)
- Obituaries (2)
- Online communities (3)
- Online discussions (16)
- Organizations (1)
- Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts (214)
- Panel discussions (8)
- PhD programs (5)
- PhD student positions (7)
- podcasts (7)
- Policy debates (179)
- Policy Materials (115)
- Postdocs (4)
- Posters (6)
- Presentations (93)
- Primers for non-specialists (2)
- Professional activities (3)
- Profiles (5)
- Project deliverables (12)
- Projects (258)
- Prototype (4)
- Reference works (3)
- Reports (5)
- Requests for comment (1)
- Requests for Information (2)
- Requests for Proposals (1)
- Research centers (6)
- Research findings (328)
- Research residencies (3)
- Resources (1)
- Scholarly resources (9)
- Scholarships (1)
- Services (1)
- Showcases (7)
- Slides (64)
- Software (36)
- Sophisticated or scholarly blogposts (3)
- Specifications (1)
- Standards (100)
- Statistics (6)
- Storify (78)
- Surveys (7)
- Syllabi (9)
- Technical reports (9)
- Technology developments (916)
- Technology tools (678)
- teleconferences (1)
- Testimonials (1)
- Textbooks (2)
- Training sessions (5)
- Translation projects (1)
- Tutorials (7)
- Tweet archives (82)
- Uncategorized (31)
- Usability tests (1)
- Videos (72)
- Visiting professor positions (3)
- Visiting scholar positions (3)
- Webcasts (10)
- Webinars (3)
- White papers (2)
- Wikis (3)
- Workshop (13)
- Workshp (1)
Archives
- July 2016 (8)
- May 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- March 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (18)
- January 2015 (17)
- December 2014 (18)
- November 2014 (27)
- October 2014 (34)
- September 2014 (55)
- August 2014 (23)
- July 2014 (29)
- June 2014 (39)
- May 2014 (42)
- April 2014 (61)
- March 2014 (62)
- February 2014 (45)
- January 2014 (37)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (39)
- October 2013 (33)
- September 2013 (22)
- August 2013 (33)
- July 2013 (48)
- June 2013 (32)
- May 2013 (36)
- April 2013 (32)
- March 2013 (34)
- February 2013 (40)
- January 2013 (41)
- December 2012 (24)
- November 2012 (28)
- October 2012 (23)
- September 2012 (24)
- August 2012 (26)
- July 2012 (53)
- June 2012 (83)
- May 2012 (77)
- April 2012 (39)
- March 2012 (36)
- February 2012 (26)
- January 2012 (19)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (25)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (20)
- July 2011 (26)
- June 2011 (26)
- May 2011 (13)
- April 2011 (25)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (19)
- January 2011 (7)
- December 2010 (56)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (14)
- September 2010 (18)
- August 2010 (62)
- July 2010 (70)
- June 2010 (92)
- May 2010 (146)
- April 2010 (57)
- March 2010 (30)
- February 2010 (61)
- January 2010 (95)
- December 2009 (56)
- November 2009 (67)
- October 2009 (51)
- September 2009 (52)
- August 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (23)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (39)
Blogroll
- 3 Geeks and a Law Blog
- AALL CS-SIS Tools & Gadgets
- Argumentation Technology (by Professor Dr. Thomas F. Gordon)
- B-Screeds (by Thomas R. Bruce)
- Best Practices for Legal Education Blog: Technology
- Binary Law: Legal Information in the Digital Age (by Nick Holmes)
- Citing Legally, by Peter Martin
- Colin Starger's Blog: In Progress
- Computational Legal Studies
- Congressional Data Coalition
- Court Technology Bulletin
- Deontic Logic Events
- Digital Directions: The E-Learning Discussion Blog for Legal Academics
- Données juridiques (Guillaume Adreani's blog)
- Empirical Legal Studies Blog
- Free Law Founders
- Free Law Project (Brian Carver and Michael Lissner)
- Hack the Law, by Elmer Masters
- Hacked Librarian (by John Joergensen)
- iinek-law's blog (by Christine Kirchberger)
- Information Law: Ιστολόγιο: Legal Informatics Blog
- International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law
- JD Supra
- Jurix: The Foundation for Legal Knowledge Based Systems
- Jury Expert
- Language, Logic, Law, Software (by Dr. Adam Wyner)
- Law & Neuroscience Blog
- Law by the Numbers: Law School Rankings, Assessment, and Demographics
- Law Design Tech, by Margaret Hagan
- Law Librarians
- Law Libraries & Librarians Blogs on Ning
- Law Library Technology (by David Holt)
- Law School 2.0
- Law School Innovation
- Law.com’s Legal Technology Blog
- LAWgical
- LawGives Blog: Data and Research on the Legal Profession
- Legal Coda (Casey Kuhlman's blog)
- Legal Design Jam, by Margaret Hagan and Stefania Passera
- Legal Hackers: The Legal Innovation Hub
- Legal Informatics subreddit, by Pablo Arredando
- Legal Information Systems & Legal Informatics Resources
- Legal OnRamp
- Legal Pioneer, by Amy Wan
- Legal Research Plus
- Legal Technology and Design, Program for (Margaret Hagan and Ron Dolin)
- Legal Technology Blog
- LegalScience.tv: Science of the Law (MIT Legal Science Research Team, led by Dazza Greenwood)
- Legix.info: Applying Legal Informatics Technologies (Grant Vergottini's blog)
- Lex (Legislative XML) Summer School Blog, of the European University Institute Department of Law
- LII Announce: Legal Informatics News from Cornell's Legal Information Institute
- List of Law Librarian/Law Library Blogs
- LLRX.com
- ONE-LEX, a Project of the European University Institute Department of Law
- Open Law Lab, by Margaret Hagan
- Open Virginia Law
- Opening Parliament
- Out of the Jungle: Thoughts on the Present and Future of Legal Information, Legal Research, and Legal Education
- Paul Maharg
- precisement.org : Un blog pour l’information juridique
- rethinck: Thoughts on the business of legal publishing (by Jason Wilson)
- Sean McGrath's Blog
- sLaw
- Social Media in Legal Education (by Melissa Castan, Kate Galloway, Melissa de Zwart, and Kristoffer Greaves)
- Staffan Malmgrens blogg
- Tabulaw Blog (Ari Hershowitz's blog)
- Technology at Albany Law School
- Teknoids
- The Orange Rag (by Charles Christian)
- The Situationist
- Think Outside the Bar – Ron Dolin's blog
- Updates for the Justice System, by Jin Ho Verdonschot
- VoxPopuLII
- Zeugma: Legal Education, Technology, Rhetoric, Legal Theory [Apparently No Longer Updated]
Tag Archives: Legal case management information systems
Cross & Donelson on Creating Quality Courts
Professor Frank B. Cross of the University of Texas School of Law, and Professor Dr. Dain C. Donelson of the University of Texas McCombs School of Business, have published Creating Quality Courts, 7 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies No. 3, … Continue reading
Posted in Articles and papers, Research findings
Tagged Assessment of judicial systems, Dain C. Donelson, Empirical methods in legal communication studies, Empirical methods in legal informatics, Evaluation of judicial systems, Frank B. Cross, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Judges' legal decisionmaking, Judicial decisionmaking, Judicial impartiality, Judicial independence, Judicial information systems, Legal case management, Legal case management information systems, Legal communication, Legal decisionmaking, Public perception of courts, Public perception of judiciary
Leave a comment
ADIJ 2010: Générations Numériques
The 2010 Annual Conference of ADIJ — l’Association pour le développement de l’information juridique — on the topic of Générations Numériques, will be held 30 September 2010, at Maison du Barreau – 2/4 rue de Harlay, Paris 1er. The conference … Continue reading
Posted in Articles and papers, Conference Announcements, Conference papers
Tagged ADIJ, ADIJ 2010, Administrative law information systems, Association pour le développement de l’information juridique, Court information systems, Judicial information systems, Legal case management information systems, Legal case management systems, Legal informatics conferences, Public access to legal information, Reuse of legal information
Leave a comment
Reagan, National Security Case Studies: Special Case-Management Challenges
Robert Timothy Reagan of the Federal Judicial Center has published National Security Case Studies: Special Case-Management Challenges (2010). Here is a summary: National security cases often pose unusual and challenging case-management issues for the courts. Evidence or arguments may be … Continue reading
Posted in Policy Materials
Tagged Best practices in legal case management, Best practices in legal communication, Criminal justice information systems, Criminal law information systems, Criminal procedure information systems, Federal Judicial Center, Legal case management, Legal case management information systems, Legal communication, Legal evidence information systems, National security cases, National security litigation
Leave a comment
Lee & Willging, Attorney Satisfaction with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Emery G. Lee III and Thomas E. Willging, both of the Federal Judicial Center, have published Attorney Satisfaction with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules (2010). Here is the executive … Continue reading
Posted in Articles and papers, Policy Materials, Research findings
Tagged Civil litigation, Civil litigation information systems, Civil procedure, Discovery, Emery G Lee, Empirical methods in legal informatics, Federal Judicial Center, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Iqbal, Judicial Conference of the United States, Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, Legal case management, Legal case management information systems, Legal communication, Legal evidence information systems, Legal pleading rules, Summary judgment, Thomas E Willging, Twombly
1 Comment
Effectively Assisting Pro Se Bankruptcy Filers: Course Materials
Full text of the program materials are now available from a October 18, 2009 joint continuing legal education program entitled Effectively Assisting Pro Se [Bankruptcy] Filers: A View from the Bench, cosponsored by the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges and … Continue reading
Posted in Conference proceedings, Course materials, Documents, Examples, Research findings
Tagged ABA Business Bankruptcy Committee, ABA Section of Business Law Business Bankruptcy Committee, Bankruptcy law information systems, Consumer bankruptcy legal information systems, Continuing legal education, Empirical methods in legal informatics, Legal advice, Legal advice to pro se litigants, Legal case administration information systems, Legal case management information systems, Legal information behavior of pro se litigants, Legal information needs of pro se litigants, Legal information services for consumer bankruptcy debtors, Legal information services for pro se litigants, Legal information use by pro se litigants, Legal research, National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges, Pro se litigants, Statistical methods in legal informatics
Leave a comment